Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+amps\s+under\s+\$1000\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest amps under $1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:16:59 -0400
What amps are out there on the used market fur under $1000 that are sufficient for contest service (i.e. occational high swr due to tx into wrong antenna at 3am, easy to tune etc.) I've investigated
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00158.html (9,604 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest amps under $1000 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Hachadorian <k6ll@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:30:00 -0700
I have an SB-220, and it works pretty well. The power transformer is a weak link for contesting, but I have modified the amp for electronic bias switching, which quickly cuts off plate current in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00159.html (10,741 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest amps under $1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:41:57 -0500
Drake L-7. $1000 that are sufficie= due to tx into wrong an= my thoughts=2E =20 was only designed for = come by=2E Possible VH= these issues are demin= extra 300-400$? some places, but designed= expe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00160.html (10,699 bytes)

4. RE: [CQ-Contest] Contest amps under $1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:10:02 -0400
Al: An amp that does not include 160 Meters is not a contest amp. It's not much of an amp at all! The 2-tube version of the Alpha 76A should fall within your $1000 limit. If you add ~$250 to your $1K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00161.html (11,561 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest amps under $1000 (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 00:23:30 -0400
At 10:16 AM 8/20/04 -0400, you wrote: What amps are out there on the used market fur under $1000 that are sufficient for contest service (i.e. occational high swr due to tx into wrong antenna at 3am,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00172.html (10,981 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest amps under $1000 (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 21 Aug 2004 17:17:41 -0500
We find it very useful at W4CAT. The antennas there are reasonably well-matched but not exceptionally so. (1.6:1 or better) I suppose we might lose a few dozen watts to mismatches but I think we more
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00175.html (8,685 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest amps under $1000 (score: 1)
Author: <mark@nevus.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:06:20 -0500
That depends if you're SO2R with 2 amps or not. I think you can get a lot of mileage out of having only one amp which can get on 160. It's not the end of the world if the other radio can't get on 16
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00198.html (8,285 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest amps under $1000 (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:09:20 -0500
Yep - and - not having 160 on your amp is not a problem for RTTY contests, Sweepstakes or any non-160 single band contests. -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr _______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00199.html (8,522 bytes)

9. RE: [CQ-Contest] Contest amps under $1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:05:46 -0400
It's tremendous bad luck to operate on any band or mode in a contest with an amplifier that does not include 160 meters, whether you plan to use it or not. There may even be an associated medical syn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00201.html (10,334 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu