Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+competitiveness\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+competitiveness\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest competitiveness (score: 1): Author: David Cockrum <n5do@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:37:15 -0500; As I read the responses about the history of low power, specifically 150 vs 100 watts, I think we are missing the elephant in the room.When it comes to factors that help an operator do well in contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00158.html (8,070 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest competitiveness (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:00:56 -0500; CQ WPX has a single tribander with single wire antennas for the low bands category. John KK9A As I read the responses about the history of low power, specifically 150 vs 100 watts, I think we are mis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00162.html (8,859 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest competitiveness (score: 1): Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:22:43 -0700; This topic keeps coming back...and underneath that elephant is the whale in the room: propagation advantage of different locations which is an even bigger factor in both DX and domestic contests. Thi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00163.html (9,868 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest competitiveness (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:22:05 -0700 (PDT); Even worse than the whale.... Some guys have way too much skill..... Follow this link http://www.tnellen.com/westside/harrison.pdf for some ideas on leveling the field. Dit dit 73, de Hans, K0HB "J; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00165.html (10,939 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest competitiveness (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:43:11 -0700; In general, and while I empathize with your concern, I don't think that it's very practical to have a restricted antenna category in a contest. It's simply too arbitrary to draw the line between all; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00167.html (12,309 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest competitiveness (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Ruz" <co8dm@frcuba.co.cu>; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:05:03 -0400; What about the ARRL Int´l Contest ???....In single band category the QRP, LP and HP are together????...it is not fear. In All Band category, 160m is very difficult for a lot of hams....why not an spe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00168.html (10,159 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]