Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+exchange\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:01:56 -0500
thats pretty much how I do it. A little will depend on the contest - some events you need to coax folks out a bit and do the CQ TEST routine. In other contests (CQWW and ARRL DX), its all business. F
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00033.html (9,210 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "AA6DX - Mark" <aa6dx@suddenlink.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:25:14 -0800
When all is going well, and I know for sure more stations are in the wings, I will end the current QSO with a simple TU ... or, better yet .. R then pause, a good op will CALL .. using the least amou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00035.html (8,844 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: somata90924@mypacks.net
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:17:36 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
it is just a contest,,,do not take it so seriously guys,,,,,,, say 73 and qrz,,,,,,,it is to be fun!!!!!!! zf2ah --Original Message-- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00044.html (20,711 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] Contest exchange (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:50:39 -0500
I got in the Wisconsin QSO Party a week ago last Sunday for my usual brief foray, CW only, 3.5 hours, 350 QSOs. Great fun! Lots of OF friends called in. The geniuses who run the WIQP -- none of them
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00459.html (7,348 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest exchange (score: 1)
Author: Alan Dewey <aldewey@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:18:21 -0400 (EDT)
Jim; I have always viewed the 5NN in the exchange as a marker to seperate the call from the usefull exchange data. You are right in that it does not convey any useful information but my guess is that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00470.html (8,221 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest exchange (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:17:36 -0700
Hi Jim, While I agree that the RST requirement doesn't provide much of a test of our ability to copy info rapidly and accurately, the rules of many contests require that we send it. You have decided
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00489.html (8,875 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 07:14:48 -0500
There is no way that this will save K1TN any time (sorry, old buddy). The number of repeat requests he will get by not following the established and REQUIRED exchange "pattern" will actually cost him
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00490.html (10,204 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest exchange (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:38:11 -0600
I'm somewhat tempted to answer the exchange that has no 5nn in it with a dit dit... but not send an exchange... or if it has already been sent, then delete the Q from my log.. as being incomplete. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00497.html (13,165 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest exchange (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:07:07 +0000
There is no way that this will save K1TN any time (sorry, old buddy). On the contrary, I have done it, in both CQWW CW and CQWW SSB, and it does save time. Every unnecessary syllable or character dr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00498.html (10,510 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] Contest exchange (score: 1)
Author: Tom Hain <tvh9992000@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
If you really do NOT want to send 5NN, or you want to make DC a multiplier, or you want 10 points when you work your friends and zero points for everyone else, why not create your own contest?  Then
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00499.html (8,545 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:50:33 -0600
Good plan James. I am with you on this one. I also avoid sending that silly 59 in the exchange. Very, very few protest and actually some even respond similarly. I could care less what happens to my l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00500.html (9,552 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest exchange (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
I'm glad we're again talking about 5NN signal reports. Single operator assistance was getting a bit tedious, and it's not quite the season to be discussing the proper CK for Sweepstakes. Please note:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00502.html (8,443 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest exchange (score: 1)
Author: w7dra@juno.com
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:25:47 -0700
taking out the 5NN is a bad idea for those of us who think slowly. contacts are so fast nowdays it is over before i even know it has happened. what is this crap of running stations only sending their
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00503.html (8,171 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest exchange (score: 1)
Author: Doug Grant <dougk1dg@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:42:45 -0400
What a great idea! http://poissondavril.webs.com/ 73, Doug K1DG Le Plus Grand Poisson de Tous les Poissons (d'Avril) p.s. The Pd'A date has not coincided with Easter since 1956 and will not again unt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00529.html (8,860 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu