Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+preferred\s+segments\s+in\s+WAE\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest preferred segments in WAE (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:02:49 -0400
This is not a trivial matter for those competing to qualify forWRTC2018, since disqualification from WAEDC also disqualifies one from competing at WRTC2018. The rule is susceptible to being read eith
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00027.html (12,763 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest preferred segments in WAE (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 09:44:21 -0700
The heart of the problem is, indeed, in the translation. I am a member of the Standards Committee of the Audio Engineering Society, which is an international body, and our Standards are written to be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00063.html (9,587 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest preferred segments in WAE (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 08:56:49 -0400
Agree with Jim here. The word "should" (to me) is a permissive word which means that you are in a position to follow the rule, but if situations and circumstances warrant, you may depart from the rul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00074.html (10,962 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest preferred segments in WAE (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Noguchi via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 15:38:07 +0000 (UTC)
The word "shall" is not always necessary to clearly articulate the intent. If the rule is rewritten to "Operation in the following segments is prohibited" I'd argue that the intended meaning is clea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00083.html (8,755 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu