Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+teams\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest Teams (score: 1)
Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:24:53 -0600
Opening up the team competition to be more than just combining scores would be very interesting. The software to allow multiple stations to interact as a "distributed multi-multi" already exists. Rem
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00088.html (9,866 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Teams (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 07:10:14 -0600
I love this discussion !!! Why ? Because it is forward thinking !!! If we continue to sit back and ride with the thoughts of well we have always done it this way and you can't do that because we have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00119.html (12,215 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Teams (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:41:11 -0500
Like the theme, Ward... How about this as an outside-the-box simple example of a new contest: -Form inter-continental virtual teams -intra-team QSOs count zero points -rest of scoring matches a curre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00121.html (11,407 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Teams (score: 1)
Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 09:02:29 -0600
Whatever the team theme/rules, all on-the-air behavior and all submitted QSO data must to comply with the sponsor's contest rules for the exchange and so forth. Messing up the sponsor's processes wou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00123.html (13,003 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Teams (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:12:57 -0600
Gerry, awesome ideas Now to find a contest sponsor willing to embrace it !!! and let it grow, not abandon it after a year or two steve KG5VK _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00124.html (12,965 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Teams (score: 1)
Author: <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 08:29:26 -0800
and like a mixed sports league, there has to be so many women on the field to have a complete team, 11 total with 4 women, only three women, you have to subtract one man, so you run with 10 mike w7dr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00129.html (7,885 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Teams (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:01:50 -0500
Steve, I agree. CQ had (and has) the right idea with overlays, and this could have continued as an overlay. I think the extreme category was important as as incentive for innovation with a proving gr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00132.html (9,067 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Teams (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:36:06 -0500
I like that idea -- keeping it within current contest rules. However, people might complain about having to sign a number after call. It's a way of getting the team ID the log. Another way would be t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00134.html (15,940 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Contest teams (score: 1)
Author: Mark <markzl3ab@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 10:02:26 +1300
I like the idea of a multi single type category, one transmitted signal, limited band changes, but I think each station must transmit for a minimum amount of time. This would make each team work to m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00138.html (8,271 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu