Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Corellating\s+logs\s+and\s+spots\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Corellating\s+logs\s+and\s+spots\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Corellating logs and spots (score: 1): Author: Denis K7GK <k7gk@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:35:03 -0800; All this talk about packet cheating, public logs and christmas wishes made me wonder how hard would it be to write a small program that correlates (now public CQWW) logs and DX Cluster spots. Here is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00499.html (8,257 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Corellating logs and spots (score: 1): Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:09:40 +0000; I've been following this thread and don't understand the problems. We have been doing this with the IOTA Contest for the past few years. If you correlate the spots with logs within, say, 5 minutes of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00517.html (9,863 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]