- 21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 22:41:26 -0500
- I got the same impression from the survey. I also feel the same way regarding removal of uniques. I was taken aback at the idea that someone might have 50% uniques. Surely there is some way of DQ som
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00059.html (10,651 bytes)
- 22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1)
- Author: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 07:28:51 +0000 (UTC)
- To be fair to Charley, who kicked off this thread, he did not actually cite the CQ Contests as to where/when his high 'Unique' count occurred. As attested by Jorma & John there is no way such a high
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00061.html (12,947 bytes)
- 23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Horton <k5iid@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 04:56:59 +0000 (UTC)
- There are many contests when I just cannot, don't want to, really get involved in. Many is the time I will work K5ZD, K1AR, K3ZO, N4ZR or any number of guys. But I usually always make sure to make mo
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00062.html (12,193 bytes)
- 24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1)
- Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:55:33 -0600
- Much of this can all be avoided by sending in a log. Maybe the answer is to ask the logging software guys to add in something like automatic sending of logs after a contest. They would be checklogs i
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00074.html (9,055 bytes)
- 25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1)
- Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 14:45:51 -0600
- The day of realtime logging is probably not that far off in the future. What I was trying to say is we are not too far away where all participants logs or contacts will be upload or tracked live duri
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00079.html (8,256 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu