Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cq\s+ww\s+ssb\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cq\s+ww\s+ssb\s*$/: 58 ]

Total 58 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: jneiger@xti.com (James B. Neiger); Date: Tue Oct 14 13:31:27 1997; ATTENTION HUNTERS NEIGER'S TIGERS will soon be prowling the jungle (i.e., CQ WW SSB DX CONTEST) in search of QSO's and multipliers. In case you desire to "bag" a few of the TIGERS, please listen for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00177.html (7,311 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: n6tj@sbcglobal.net (James Neiger); Date: Wed Oct 30 21:51:24 2002; Hi All: JUST off 18 hours plane ride from Ascension Island, with K6NA and N6ND. Our 3 man M/2 from ZD8Z was a blast, and pleased to provide the double mult to so many of the "deserving". And even to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00271.html (7,183 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG); Date: Thu Oct 31 10:24:14 2002; A half-hour or so after I had *dug* my way onto 21200.5 (OK, it was luck) and started running, I was essentially asked, by probably that same xxxx (who is ALWAYS on 200.5), "Are you going to be there; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00279.html (6,964 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG); Date: Thu Oct 31 12:21:23 2002; Somehow, in my editing, an important phrase was deleted... It should have read, "...I was essentially asked, GOOD NATUREDLY, by probably that same xxxx..." In case there should be any confusion...I w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00288.html (7,573 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: Bob Cox <bobk3est@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:55:56 -0800; Dear Fellow Contesters, The conditions during the CQ WW SSB were outstanding! We hope you had a great time. If you have not sent in your SSB log yet, please send it to ssb@cqww.com. * **No matter how; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00197.html (7,277 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: Andy Kazantsev <uu0jm@mail.ru>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:17:16 +0400; Hi, gyus! What do you feel about it.... http://cqnewsroom.blogspot.com/2014/10/cq-policy-on-crimean-stations-using.html I participated in CQ WW RTTY 2014, and planning to participate in CQ WW SSB&CW.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00098.html (7,473 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:30:22 -0400; UB7K is nothing but an illegally issued pirate call in Crimea, which is part of Ukraine, not Russia. 73, Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00099.html (9,339 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: Saulius Zalnerauskas <ly5w.sam@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:33:02 +0200; I think if you are real patriot - YOU MUST LOVE YOUR COUNTRY! If you are just occupant - not work in contest with nelegal CALL! Go away to Russia and work from there, no problem at all. I hate war, l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00100.html (9,567 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:27:02 -0500; I think that CQ and that radio club in Newington need to stick to hobby radio stuff, and get their nose out of international politics. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his radio" -- Proud Member; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00101.html (10,521 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 02:09:01 +0600; I thought contesting and ham radio in general are supposed to help to overcome political issues and unite people with passion to radio. IMHO this act of the CQWW sponsors is pushing ham radio in oppo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00102.html (10,052 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:39:53 -0400; Andy, Personally, I am sorry for your situation. And sorry that you are harmed right now. Is it not possible for you to operate using the Ukrainian callsign? I think that I would have worded the CQ a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00103.html (8,006 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:49:23 +0100; In that case Andy you have made political decision and any matters of compensation for your time and expense lie solely with yourself, not the ham community or contest organisers. As you well know ou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00105.html (10,829 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: Andy Kazantsev <uu0jm@bk.ru>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 01:55:05 +0400; Hi, Edward. 18 2014 ., 0:39:53: I currently live in Russia. And shall comply with the laws of Russia. According to these laws, I got a call UB7K and worked in several contests, including the CQ WW RT; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00106.html (10,653 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:08:48 -0400; Andy, Politics and ham radio should be kept separate and operation should be encouraged everywhere. Indeed, I would say that only positive developments can come from continued communication, amateur; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00107.html (9,929 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 09:23:59 -0500; The CQ WW Contest Committee was very divided on this issue. The Editor and Publisher of CQ Magazine have made this policy decision. Any comments or appeals should be directed to CQ. Randy, K5ZD _____; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00108.html (11,329 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:30:53 -0700; What do you feel about it.... I strongly agree with CQ's decision. Russia's invasion of Crimea and eastern Ukraine is a CRIME. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00109.html (9,258 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 03:13:35 +0000; Regardless of what I might personally think about certain geopolitical events, I wholeheartedly agree with Dave's sentiments. I do wonder, however, if this sets a poor precedent for a future installm; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00110.html (9,331 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: Andy Melanin <ua3dpx@mail.ru>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 07:15:31 +0400; It's not so well for the CQ comity follow politicians brain illness. Crimea is RUSSIA !! That was the dessision of the people who live there. Amateur radio must be out of politics. I thimpathize with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00111.html (13,028 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:57:32 +1000; Unfortunate political decision from CQ Contest Committee. Like UA9CDC so well expressed, this decision resembles Soviet Union policy of prohibiting Amateur Radio Communication between former USSR and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00112.html (13,119 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1): Author: Martin Monsalvo <monsalvo@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 01:09:16 -0300; With all due respect and with all the appreciation I feel towards long term friends in both Russia and Ukraine. Crimea is not part of Russia, despite the fact that it is being illegally annexed to it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00113.html (13,602 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]