Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cut\s+numbers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cut\s+numbers\s*$/: 85 ]

Total 85 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers (score: 1): Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:09:21 -0400; While we are on cut numbers, I'd (again) like to plead for hams to stop sending "J" for "1." That is fairly common among second tier European contesters. Some even have their computers set to send "J; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00068.html (7,224 bytes)
62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 23:10:50 -0000; You're quite right, John. If cut numbers are to be used, then they must be standardized. And they really should not be used for the vital part of a contest exchange; leading zeros excluded. 5NN is fi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00069.html (8,976 bytes)
63. [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 13:44:29 -0000; I respect Dave and his commitment to adjudicating the contest. If it is too hard to adjudicate with cut numbers, then I think it is reasonable to restrict their use in the logs. However, if it is pur; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00106.html (7,585 bytes)
64. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic', S56A" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 00:20:20 +0200; K4BAI wrote: While we are on cut numbers, I'd (again) like to plead for hams to stop sending "J" for "1." IARU Reg. I CW Field Day was last weekend with few stations having RFI and using manual keyin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00113.html (7,787 bytes)
65. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers (score: 1): Author: "Hal Offutt" <hal@japancorporateresearch.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:38:33 +0900; Isn't D the common abbreviation for 8? If it's reasonable to use U for 2, it is certainly just as reasonable to use D for 8 (in both cases the sender is saving two dashes). And wouldn't consistency d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00122.html (8,527 bytes)
66. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers (score: 1): Author: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>; Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 10:22:41 +0300; ... all >of them, just the exact point of dot to dash transition. If I am expecting >numbers, A is enough for 1, U for 2, V for 3, E for 5, G for 7, N for 9 and >T equals 0. Numbers 4, 6 and 8 can't; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00123.html (9,217 bytes)
67. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic', S56A" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 21:49:42 +0200; OH6LI wrote: Blurring 1 by sending A is unnecessarily difficult. This is exactly the same logical and timing abbreviation as N for 9 but we are nurtured with frequent 5NN. You would appreciate cut nu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00148.html (7,824 bytes)
68. [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers (score: 1): Author: "Dick-w0raa" <w0raa@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:02:25 -0700; I had several stations send me a NN for their power. I assumed they were running 99 watts and that's how I logged it. Was I right or wrong? Maybe a way to solve this cut number crap is to have 3 cate; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00344.html (7,184 bytes)
69. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers (score: 1): Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:45:28 -0600; Just log it as it as the bo...er, ah....operator sent it and don't worry about converting it. 73, Dale, kg5u _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00421.html (7,418 bytes)
70. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:34:32 -0500; I don't know about the rest of y'all but I have never been dinged any points in the ARRL test for having the wrong power in the exchange. What's the issue? Ed N1UR ___________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00433.html (7,146 bytes)
71. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:55:33 -0500; Well, I sure have - no penalty, but I lost 3 Qs last year for incorrect power numbers. 73, Pete _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00446.html (7,749 bytes)
72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:34:13 +0000; I've been dinged for wrong power in the log. Maybe they just do it for the top scorers in each category, but in these days of computer log checking, that doesn't make a lot of sense. Did you look at; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00451.html (8,040 bytes)
73. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Alan Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:40:56 -0800; You can go to: http://www.arrl.org/contests/results/ and check your LCR (log checking reports). There are several years contests listed. I have been dinged in each and every contest listed for Incorr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00496.html (9,665 bytes)
74. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:53:43 -0400; Hank wrote this a while back, but I'll put in an observation from the recent WPX CW, as well as some other contests. If I sent a single-digit number, or a two-digit number, specially later in the con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00201.html (7,828 bytes)
75. [CQ-Contest] cut numbers (score: 1): Author: Marc - ON7SS - OO9O <on7ss.oo9o@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:13:34 +0100; I believe this is getting ridicullus. First time I heard some send AE for 15..... Well the guy lost the time he would have won, had to ask three times for a repeat before he sended 15. Considering to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00227.html (6,980 bytes)
76. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:57:32 +1100; First time I heard some send AE for 15..... Well the guy lost the time he would have won, had The CQWW exchange is known in advance for many zones, including zone 15. There was no need to ask for a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00230.html (7,070 bytes)
77. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 03:04:04 +0100; And you could call cq as EIEDI, as it is known in advance that a call contains a number. 73 Peter, DJ7WW The CQWW exchange is known in advance for many zones, including zone 15. There was no need to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00232.html (8,241 bytes)
78. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 08:55:05 -0600; I just HATE the not often used cut numbers. 5NN fine. even like my zone T4, fine, I'll even stretch it a tiny bit if I hear O4 "O" as in the letter "O" three dashes. I understand the reasoning, send; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00248.html (10,761 bytes)
79. [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers (score: 1): Author: Marvin Bloomquist <n5aw@281.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:38:12 -0600; This has been about beaten to death but there are occasional instances where I find cut numbers N and T helpful. - if someone insists on leading zeros I prefer they use T - the normal zero can sound; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00252.html (7,373 bytes)
80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers (score: 1): Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:02:34 -0600; I too have a soft spot in my heart for cut numbers. I rarely use them other than 5nn, however once I used them in a cwops mini test to send my member number, which is 1013, or ATAV. It elicited lots; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00265.html (10,270 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]