Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+DC\s+and\s+NAQP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+DC\s+and\s+NAQP\s*$/: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:24:49 -0400 (GMT-04:00); With this talk about new sections/multipliers, I think what NN3W may have hinted at is: Why is DC not a multiplier in the NAQP? I asked this same question a few years ago and got exactly one answer t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00117.html (7,343 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:37:45 -0400; Here, here! Add CQ WW RTTY to the list as well. 73, Paul, N8HM Washington, DC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00121.html (7,834 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:53:36 -0500; The mults in NAQP are US states, Canadian provinces and north American countries. DC is not a state. The rules do mention DC and say that it counts as MD for this contest. -- George Fremin III ______; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00124.html (8,203 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:52:43 -0400; We are not part of Maryland. We shouldn't count as Maryland for any purpose. 73, Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00125.html (9,640 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Jeffrey Embry <jeffrey.embry@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:59:28 -0400; All, If this is indeed the case, then perhaps Virginia, Massachusetts, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania, while politically different are technically Commonwealths and not States. While I will admit that DC; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00126.html (10,734 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:34:41 -0700; Whatever. I think they are states. Let me see US States have two senators each in the congress: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm/ Choose a State...... Those states a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00127.html (8,808 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 02:15:39 +0000; I've said it before and I'll say it again......Zip Code 55075 should count as a double multiplier in all contests. I even know guy who lives there. 73 Steve K0SR _____________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00136.html (8,219 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:25:12 -0400 (EDT); If DC is not a state, does it count as Maryland for multiplier purposes? It is not a part of Maryland for the US political organization purposes you listed. (It is part of the MDC ARRL section for co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00137.html (10,955 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Jeffrey Embry <jeffrey.embry@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:31:47 -0400; Coversely, one could ask why is there so much resistance to DC being considered ad a mult by the organizers? This debate had gone for several years, and it seems that neither side wants to even compr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00138.html (11,650 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:47:25 -0400; I think a LOT of the debate here gets mired in politics - which is unfortunate. DC is a unique city. Its not a state. Its not a province. Its not part of Maryland, or Virginia. Nor will it ever be. N; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00139.html (11,629 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:06:49 -0700; Why should DC to be a mult in (insert contest name here)? It is a mult in some contests. Does it need to be a mult in all contests? -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00140.html (8,897 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Eric Rosenberg <ericrosenberg.dc@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:27:12 -0400; George, I think you've missed the point in this discussion. No one is asking that DC be called or considered to be a state. We aren't. All we are asking is that in contests where the multiplier is st; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00141.html (9,014 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:01:14 -0400; Oh, we could have a lot of fun with the semantics. After all, technically, isn't Puerto Rico a Commonwealth as well? However... VA, MA, KY & PA are political entities that have been admitted to the U; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00142.html (13,063 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Aldewey@aol.com; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:16:53 -0400 (EDT); Correct me if I'm wrong but PR and VI ARE multipliers in NAQP. Right? What am I missing? 73, Al, K0AD In a message dated 8/11/2012 8:36:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time, wn3vaw@verizon.net writes: Other; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00144.html (8,428 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:53:10 -0700; I do not think I have missed the point. You want it to be a mult in a contest that uses states as multipliers. I have never said that and I think it is a silly argument. My real point is - why add DC; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00145.html (10,627 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:55:02 -0700; How will this improve the NAQP? -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00146.html (9,143 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@ab1od.org>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:11:30 -0400; It's worth remembering that other US territories are separate DXCC entities, explaining why they are separate multipliers in, for example, the NAQP. Personally, I agree that DC ought to be a separate; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00147.html (15,559 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:51:49 -0400; They are. As is UN Headquarters. It's silly that a building in Manhattan is a multiplier but the District of Columbia is not. The fact is that the District of Columbia is the only separate top-level; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00151.html (9,298 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:57:25 -0400; Are you really being that obtuse? More multipliers, more QSOs, more challenge, more activity. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contestin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00154.html (9,587 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1): Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:28:37 -0600; I am a little puzzled here. There are at least two phrases used in English that sound the same but are spelled differently and have different meaning. One is "hear, hear" generally associated with th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00157.html (11,351 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]