Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+DOES\s+COMMON\s+SCORING\s+ENCOURAGE\s+MEDIOCRITY\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+DOES\s+COMMON\s+SCORING\s+ENCOURAGE\s+MEDIOCRITY\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] DOES COMMON SCORING ENCOURAGE MEDIOCRITY ? (score: 1): Author: vk4ti@yahoo.com; Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:00:29 -0700 (PDT); What are the common thoughts on contests scoring both the ALL BAND and SINGLE BAND scores of an individual operator ?? For example the contest scores the entry category of Single Operator All band an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00147.html (7,599 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] DOES COMMON SCORING ENCOURAGE MEDIOCRITY ? (score: 1): Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:05:21 -0400; Trent, I was looking at QST magazines from the late 1940's and a station could be listed on say all band and then 20 and 10 (no 15 back then). Confusing at first until you got to understand. I feel t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00149.html (9,499 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] DOES COMMON SCORING ENCOURAGE MEDIOCRITY ? (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:32:09 -0400; Now that you mention it, I would qualify. My 160 antenna is an inverted L (single wire). However, I believe that also rules out the use of RX antennas... But I don't have a tribander... Oh well. Tom; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00150.html (7,829 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]