Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Deleted\s+ARRL\s+sections\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:45:16 -0800
Some trivia in advance of the ARRL Sweepstakes this month... Probably everyone is familiar with the idea of deleted DXCC entities - countries that no longer exist but did at some point in the past du
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00110.html (8,716 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:11:30 -0800
Florida is now >>THREE<< sections.... SFL, NFL, and WCF (West Central Florida). Minnesota once was two sections, North MN and South MN. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his Radio" Sea stories her
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00112.html (10,528 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:08:15 -0800
Canal Zone _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00114.html (7,435 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@optonline.net
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:19:03 +0000 (GMT)
West Indies (which at one time included Cuba as well as PR and USVI) Phillipines --MK Michael Keane, K1MK k1mk@alum.mit.edu _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00115.html (7,587 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@optonline.net
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:25:10 +0000 (GMT)
Georgia-South Carolina-Cuba-Isle of Pines Utah-Wyoming Maryland-Delaware-DC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00116.html (7,306 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: "Glenn Wyant" <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:06:24 -0500
Almost ONTARIO However war of 1812 fixed that one ... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00124.html (8,012 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:35:47 -0600
In 1935... Utah-Wyoming was a single section. MDC was a section -- but it was really MDDC (or MDDDC?) because Delaware was part of it too. The West Indies indeed included PR, USVI, Cuba, and the Isle
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00125.html (8,271 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:20:38 -0500
Ken, How about Canal Zone (KZ5)? I"m pretty sure it was a section and deleted in 1975 (if memory serves). Dave/K8CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00126.html (9,675 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:30:45 -0600
"Minnesota once was two sections, North MN and South MN." Really? When was this? Actually, this whole discussion is very interesting. It would make a good nostalgia piece in QST or NCJ. 73 de Bob - K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00134.html (12,637 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:40:41 -0500
Strictly speaking, none of these sections are "deleted." As population increases and other factors resulted in the creation of new sections from the restructured old ones, the original ones were simp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00136.html (10,645 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:47:23 -0600
I doubt anyone operated Sweepstakes from Baja Nuevo, Serrana Bank, Roncador Cay or Swan Island when they were possessed by the US, but out of curiosity, what section would they have fit under? The Pa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00141.html (12,434 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:49:36 -0500
The South Carolina section was split off from the "GA-SC-etc." section in time for the 1937 Sweepstakes. (and yes, that's how that section was listed in the SS results in QST!) Georgia and West Indie
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00142.html (8,984 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:10:31 -0800
Well - take the case of Washington (WA) in 1989. It was split into Eastern Washington (EWA) and Western Washington (WWA). For the purposes of contest awards and records, WA was "deleted" in the exact
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00146.html (9,565 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:57:28 -0600
Now a question, has the total numbers of sections remained the same? when one is split are two combined? has the number always been the same? otherwise the mults are all messed up if someone was to t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00147.html (12,003 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:24:26 -0800
The number of sections has changed over time. The first sweepstakes contests had 68 sections. In 1990, there were 77 sections. Today, there are 80 sections. The most recent changes were: 1 Jan 1996 N
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00149.html (10,429 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:48:45 -0700
Why was the NNY section created? Was is to create a "rare" section for contesting? Certainly population growth wasn't the reason. Did someone with significant influence at ARRL push for it, similar t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00153.html (11,784 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@optonline.net
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:16:27 +0000 (GMT)
US possessions in the Pacific were incorporated into the then Hawaii section (now Pacific) effective 1 April 1951. Prior to that date I suspect that while those possession were part of the ARRL's Pa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00156.html (9,300 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:25:02 -0500
Ummm... no. Close, but wrong analogy. Czechoslovakia ceased to exist, as it split into two new countries (entities). A better analogy from the DXCC world would be Serbia. Once upon a time, that count
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00163.html (11,038 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:26:34 -0500
Okay, then how about the the Utah-Wyoming section? If Czechoslovakia ceased to exist then Utah-Wyoming must have ceased to exist as a section when it was split into two new section? According to that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00171.html (9,782 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:08:43 -0600
IMHO you're comparing apples and oranges. ARRL Sections and DXCC Entities have completely different purposes. DXCC Entities exist for the purpose of the award. Maintaining a list of "deleted entitie
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00178.html (10,257 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu