Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Did\s+Anyone\s+Run\s+CW\s+Skimmer\s+for\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+or\s+CQ\s+160\s+COtnests\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Did\s+Anyone\s+Run\s+CW\s+Skimmer\s+for\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+or\s+CQ\s+160\s+COtnests\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Did Anyone Run CW Skimmer for ARRL DX or CQ 160 COtnests?? (score: 1): Author: Eric Rosenberg - W3DQ <w3dq@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:13:42 -0500; I'm the editor of the Potomac Valley Radio Club's (PVRC) Newsletter, where we published Pete Smith's (N4ZR) excellent review of CW Skimmer in the last issue I 'm putting together a follow-on piece an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00574.html (7,678 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did Anyone Run CW Skimmer for ARRL DX or CQ 160 COtnests?? (score: 1): Author: Aldewey@aol.com; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:02:20 EST; All; I, too, am interested in hearing of practical applications of CW Skimmer in some real contests. I am especially interested in situations where stations have run completely independent of the DX; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00598.html (8,192 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did Anyone Run CW Skimmer for ARRL DX or CQ 160 COtnests?? (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:26:00 -0500; K0AD: maps yet. Unlikely since I don't believe VE3NEA has done the Telnet output for Skimmer yet. 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00608.html (7,085 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]