Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Dupes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Dupes\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: nh7a@arrl.net (Albert Crespo); Date: Wed Jan 9 18:25:58 2002; In contests where serial numbers are given, it is very easy to figure out who is really competing and those that are just giving out QSO's. 95%+ of the dupes are from people that give out low numbers; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00122.html (7,339 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: va3uz@rac.ca (Yuri Onipko); Date: Wed Jan 9 16:12:44 2002; Hi Al At the same time 9% of 4000 QSO is 360 Q's which is at least 2 hours of good run... 73 Yuri VA3UZ -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00135.html (7,459 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: KG6DV@cs.com (KG6DV@cs.com); Date: Wed Jan 9 19:15:02 2002; Al (NH7A) states one of the major sources of dupes is the non-serious contest participant, one that may not be using a computer log system or keeping a dupe sheet and often handing out a low contact/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00144.html (9,353 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] dupes (score: 1): Author: k3ft@erols.com (Chuck K3FT); Date: Wed Jan 9 21:29:24 2002; My 6.4 cents worth (inflation) What I do, when a station calls me and CT tells me it's a dupe I just go ahead and work em, assuming not a serno contest. As he's replying to me I make sure I copy his; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00151.html (7,363 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Wed Jan 9 23:26:26 2002; In TR, at least, and I think NA and CT, the running score displayed constantly by the program has dupes properly accounted for. So even if the Q totals go down from what you were seeing, the score do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00157.html (7,375 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:46:11 -0500; Interesting question. Looking back at previous logs here we usually have about 100 dupes in a 3000 QSO log, and 140 dupes in a 4000 QSO log and 175 in a 5000 QSO log. I bet K3LR W3LPL and KC1XX end; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00148.html (10,196 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] dupes (score: 1): Author: Jim Fitzpatrick <jhfitzpa@wiscmail.wisc.edu>; Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:19:51 -0600; I duped a few stations this weekend, maybe 5 or 6. Most of them were due to me mistyping the station's callsign in the call field the second time I worked them. And of course they come up as not havi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00154.html (8,644 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 00:09:12 -0500; At 11:46 AM 12/5/2003, Tom Frenaye K1KI wrote: Looking back at previous logs here we usually have about 100 dupes in a 3000 QSO log, and 140 dupes in a 4000 QSO log and 175 in a 5000 QSO log. I bet K; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00167.html (9,888 bytes)
9. RE: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:32:51 -0000; a 9000 on there's one good possibility... it shows there are probably more casual ops who don't keep computerized logs and make more qso's than they can easily check in their paper log by eye for du; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00171.html (9,964 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 18:58:02 +0100; Yes about the same. We had 318 dupes in a 11490 QSO log so that´s even less then some of these figures. Guess that´s what you have to expect. I suppose I´m not used to logs with tha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00180.html (11,285 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: "JAMES HEADRICK" <w3cp@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 18:14:00 -0000; In contest practice CW accuracy is better than that of fone. This is especially true for people like me who have high audio frequency hearing loss. 73 jim w3cp QSO CW? -- The world's top contesters b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00181.html (10,678 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: kk7gw@hotmail.com (David Jones); Date: Fri Jan 9 19:32:56 1998; consuming I'll start my comments by saying that I've seen both sides of this. In my first real CW contest (as in 30+ wpm in the 1996 Cal QSO party) I managed to get contacts by listening to the prev; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00160.html (8,183 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] dupes (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Thu Dec 10 15:30:10 1998; Here is my dupe experience at 8P9Z this year CQWWCW. 6560 non dupe QSOs, 162 dupes. Call signed every QSO (almost). Every QSOs except tail enders like ZW5B mentioned in his write up and a few USA pil; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00052.html (6,982 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:42:53 -0800; OK, here is another reason to work dupes. I was playing around on 160 Friday night and thought I'd make a few contacts in the RAC. I started at the bottom of the band and worked my way up. When I got; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00380.html (6,965 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:10:05 -0000; There are still some people who haven't seen the light and still live in fear of getting dq'ed because they have too many dupes in the log. Remember the paper log days when there was a clause in some; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00434.html (10,633 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: "Dale Putnam" <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:19:28 -0700; Yep, happens a lot, and in some of the contests... and not trying to arrogant or bad mannered, in some of the contests... I am the only contester on from Wy.... and likely the only one that the stati; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00443.html (8,378 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:50:06 -0600; This happens to me all the time because people think Larry, K5OT, and I are interchangeable for some reason, eh, Larry? I have never had a person whose "QSO B4" I replied to with "NIL" blow me off.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00446.html (7,278 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:31:39 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 99.9% of the time I do work dupes, but I have the B4 macro ready just for the guy that dupes me the third time in ten minutes. It h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00456.html (7,575 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:53:24 -0600 (CST); Dave, I think I owe you one. I had forgotten that rule but there has always been something in the dim murky corners of my mind telling me that workling dupes was really bad. You've identified it and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00462.html (8,147 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@wanadoo.fr>; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:29:28 -0000; I had 131 dupes in CQWW PH while operating as 6W1RY, all by stations calling me. That is a dupe rate of 2 1/2 percent. That seems a constant over the years, even with free contest software available; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00004.html (11,117 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]