Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Dupes\s+vs\.\s+Not\s+in\s+Log\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Dupes\s+vs\.\s+Not\s+in\s+Log\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Dupes vs. Not in Log (score: 1): Author: "WA7VNI" <wa7vni@dayshaw.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:39:20 -0800; Given the discussion in another thread regarding too many dupes I'd like to ask for the collected wisdom on best practice when the station you are calling says you are a dupe but they are not in your; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00086.html (8,319 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes vs. Not in Log (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 16:51:26 -0500; At 08:39 AM 12/4/03 -0800, WA7VNI wrote: What should I do? Do I say "no, not in my log" or just let it go. Neither of these stations were mult's for me so the loss on my part was minimal and I just l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00103.html (8,940 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes vs. Not in Log (score: 1): Author: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:08:00 -0500; I usually say "NIL", but if it's no mult, I don't get too crazy over it...if it's a mult, I try real hard to make the guy work me again. Sometimes, I'll just let it go entirely, satisfied in the know; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00108.html (8,583 bytes)
4. Fw: [CQ-Contest] Dupes vs. Not in Log (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 07:10:32 -0000; Quack's Another way to handle this is if he says QSO B-4 in any contest that doesn't require a SN is to log him then and move on. The times won't agree but he has said Q B-4 so if your in his log and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00125.html (10,201 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]