Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+EF\-240S\s+at\s+40\s+feet\s+vs\.\s+4\s+square\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+EF\-240S\s+at\s+40\s+feet\s+vs\.\s+4\s+square\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] EF-240S at 40 feet vs. 4 square (score: 1): Author: deuhs@earthlink.net; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 15:04:50 -0500 (GMT-05:00); Hello all: I currently have a EF-240S (part of a C-4SXL) at 40 feet on a quad mount roof tower. It works surprisingly well, and my quad mount (Glenn Martin) is built like a tank. Since my big tower p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00176.html (7,842 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] EF-240S at 40 feet vs. 4 square (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 20:34:23 EDT; located in a marshy area of my yard. << If your 4-square is on good ground - marshy area and has clear shot it should rule on DX low angle stuff. 40 m band appreciates the low angle at band openings; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00180.html (7,337 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] EF-240S at 40 feet vs. 4 square (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 20:59:42 -0400; Greg, I took down my 40 meter 4 square after putting up an OptiBeam OB2-40 last year. Here is what I experienced: Setup: - The OB2-40 is at 92' - The 4 square had 480 1/2-wave radials - Terrain map t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00182.html (9,390 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]