Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Elecraft\s+KPA\s+1500\s+vs\.OM\s+2000A\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: Bill kollenbaum via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 00:03:56 +0000 (UTC)
Looking for a backup amp for the new station.  Probably going to run SO2R so auto-tune is important.  I'm running a K3S and the second radio will also be a K3S.  I really don't care if the amp "match
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00007.html (7,200 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: Chris Plumblee <chris.plumblee@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 06:16:30 -0500
The KPA1500 offers ~1kw on 6M if thats important to you. I have no first-hand experience with either amp. 73, Chris W4WF -- Chris Plumblee 407.494.5155 _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00008.html (8,691 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 00:32:09 -0800
Hi Bill, I've owned a KPA1500 since early July. It's NOT auto-tune like an 87A, but it can memorize multiple trained settings for each output. This makes it more or less equivalent to the 87A IF we'v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00009.html (9,287 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:14:14 -0500
Bill, I know a little about the KPA1500 since K4BAI bought one this past summer. His worked fine until about a week ago when it started putting out 1/2 power - around 700 watts. I posted a message on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00010.html (9,553 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 22:52:50 -0500
Nothing matches the speed of tuning of a solid state amp. So, I'd go with the KPA1500. 73 Ria, N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00011.html (8,206 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:13:34 -0500
If you want auto tuning with an amp, you cant beat the SPE amps. I have an older one, the 1K-FA and love it. Solid state autotune up to FOUR antennas with two inputs. Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00012.html (9,768 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:08:22 -0600
My only issue with the KPA1500 is that its very fussy about SWR: it wont put out full power at more than about 1.3:1. However, the ATU will usually get it low enough. Im told the Expert 2K will do 1.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00013.html (9,421 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: David Aslin G3WGN <david@aslinvc.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 17:39:46 +0000
I was warned off the OM2000A for reasons of extreme fan noise. Several guys whose views I respect have swapped them out for that reason. Instead I added a second ACOM 2000A. I have a very early one (
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00014.html (9,824 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:13:19 -0500
Super loud and super SWR sensitive doesnt sound like good characteristics for an amp. Backing off at 1.3:1 doesnt leave one much play on 80 or 160M. Ed N1UR --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00016.html (11,318 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:45:12 -0600
The SWR issue isnt really a show stopper, as the ATU, once trained can generally keep the SWR low enough. In normal CW content operation, including lots of CQing, the fans are barely audible with a R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00017.html (12,093 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 17:57:05 -0800
I have NOT experienced SWR sensitivity with reasonable antennas that the KPA1500's built-in tuner can't handle. I suspect someone having this problem has not RTFM, which describes how to train the tu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00018.html (9,603 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 20:14:21 -0500
Bill, You might consider an OM2000A+ . This is an automatic no tune amplifier. https://www.om-power.com/products/om2000aplus I looked on the OM Power web page and I don't see that they sell OM2000A's
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00019.html (11,279 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: "Alan M. Eshleman" <doctore@well.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:48:27 -0800 (PST)
I have NOT experienced SWR sensitivity with reasonable antennas that the KPA1500's built-in tuner can't handle. I suspect someone having this problem has not RTFM, which describes how to train the tu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00021.html (9,961 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: David Aslin G3WGN <david@aslinvc.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 21:36:34 +0000
Jeff, Two reasons for an amp capable of more than 400W: Unusually, UK licencing regs allow 400W *at the antenna feedpoint*. Cable runs on 10m and 6m here are 420ft; measured cable loss is 1.8dB at 28
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00022.html (12,620 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: "Dan" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 10:50:54 -0500
I agree with Jim's comment. My KPA 1500 does not fold back until I reach close to 3 to 1. I rarely use the tuner and my CC 2L 40 will cover the whole band without using a tuner. I would imagine that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00023.html (11,267 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:22:45 -0600
Perhaps theres something wrong with my KPA1500. (Yes, I did RTFM.) At any SWR above 1.5:1, according to the meter on the amp, it will usually fault due to either high current or excessive drive power
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00024.html (12,104 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: Everett Jackson <wz8p@wz8p.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 15:32:32 -0500
I run 20 watts all the time in to my KPA 1500. The SWR is 1.1:1 most of the time. With the turner, sometimes it is 1.3:1. My out put is 800 -1000 W all the time depending on band and antenna. 73, Eve
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00025.html (9,014 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:49:02 -0700
I had access to a KPA1500 for one day during ARRL DX CW 2018. I found that 1500 watts into 1.5 SWR always produced a hard fault. SWR had to be 1.4 or less on every tuner segment. The tuner had to be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00026.html (13,611 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 21:59:15 -0500
There is a raft of interrelated parameters that can be set in the KPA-1500 firmware on a per-band basis, relating to the allowable SWR.  The KPA-1500 manual is of limited help on these, and much more
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00027.html (12,593 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:27:53 -0500
Those are two completely different animals, one is lightweight and has LDMOS finals that need an antenna tuner or a perfect antena and the other uses a ceramic tetrode that can tolerate 3:1 SWR. A te
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00037.html (9,385 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu