- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Erroneous Ten Minute Violations (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave - AB7E" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:13:00 -0700
- Yeah, I had the same thought myself. My logger (N1MM) uses the computer clock, which is regularly updated online and is rarely off by even a few seconds, but if the log checking process looks at othe
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00246.html (10,460 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Erroneous Ten Minute Violations (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:33:37 -0400
- Side notes: clocks are set all over the place, and even internet computer updating is not 100 percent reliable. I had a time server that kept (re)setting my clock incorrectly. So any determination of
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00260.html (10,125 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Erroneous Ten Minute Violations (score: 1)
- Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:10:04 +0000
- Considering how few DQs occur, I assume those that were DQed this year were fairly blatant and egregious in their misdeeds. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _____________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00272.html (10,827 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu