- 1. [CQ-Contest] Exchange info in Summaries (score: 1)
- Author: mwdink@eskimo.com (Michael Dinkelman)
- Date: Wed Jan 3 04:59:20 2001
- Hello all One of the members of the list (who I'll not name unless he wants to come forward) made a perfectly valid point to me tonight. One I guess that hadn't occurred to my simplistic mind. In fac
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-01/msg00009.html (8,265 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Exchange info in Summaries (score: 1)
- Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com)
- Date: Wed Jan 3 17:42:54 2001
- Interesting problem. I guess some people can post their info with the WRONG grid in it and see if people get busted for that. I seriously hope nobody is finding that going to all the trouble to compa
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-01/msg00010.html (7,175 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Exchange info in Summaries (score: 1)
- Author: k1ir@designet.com (Jim Idelson)
- Date: Wed Jan 3 09:02:30 2001
- Mike, Cheating will be done with or without your assistance. However, the vast majority play contest for fun and don't do significant cheating. Your reported scores generally come from the top ops wi
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-01/msg00011.html (7,231 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Exchange info in Summaries (score: 1)
- Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John Laney)
- Date: Thu Jan 4 17:11:00 2001
- Dink and all: I recommend publishing QTH information where it affect awards. In other words, if there is an award for high state or ARRL Section, the report will be far less meaningful if the section
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-01/msg00015.html (9,637 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu