Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Extreme\s+S\&P\s+with\s+the\s+RBN\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Extreme\s+S\&P\s+with\s+the\s+RBN\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Extreme S&P with the RBN (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:29:48 -0500; Since I didn't have much time last weekend, I decided to use that time working on efficient techniques for S&P using cluster spots from the RBN. I know it isn't everyone's cup of tea, but for those w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00448.html (9,307 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Extreme S&P with the RBN (score: 1): Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:58:15 -0500; Excellent Pete! I am wondering the same thing. When I was having trouble finding a clear freq on 40 in CQWW CW, I went S&P and had rates from 120-190/hr. My trick was to always skip stations who were; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00452.html (11,162 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Extreme S&P with the RBN (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 00:18:47 +0000; <snip> It seems to me that "S&P assisted" is a misnomer. As described, there was no "searching" in any conventional sense. Instead, a more accurate term for the activity might be C&P, clicking and po; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00491.html (9,628 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]