Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FD\s+logging\s+program\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] FD logging program (score: 1)
Author: jljarvis@adelphia.net (jljarvis)
Date: Sun Apr 21 14:05:31 2002
W1MOO, 5A VT, will change from TR to Writelog this year. 6 node ethernet network....5 stations and a site-executive laptop. Last year, TR's quirky use of memory cost us 50Q's and two key hours of dow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00274.html (7,530 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] FD logging program (score: 1)
Author: rrossi@btv.ibm.com (Ron D. Rossi)
Date: Mon Apr 22 13:11:20 2002
Same setup as TR. Jim the year before it was because all the power save features were not turned off on the laptop. Last year we might have lost 50Qs, but it was because the CW tent "HAD" to run on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00290.html (8,605 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] FD logging program (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: Mon Apr 22 13:21:50 2002
My one, weekend-long, experience with Writelog (we had another nickname for it) was in a fully networked, 6-station, multi-multi environment and was less than thrilling. Most PCs locked up at various
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00295.html (8,023 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] FD logging program (score: 1)
Author: k1ir@designet.com (Jim Idelson)
Date: Mon Apr 22 18:23:28 2002
Mike, Your story about WriteLog isn't what we experience here in our multi-single operations. Once we get the Windows networking configured right, we never have a problem getting a machine back on li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00298.html (8,766 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] FD logging program (score: 1)
Author: k8do@amethyst.diamondcs.net (Dennis O'Connor)
Date: Tue Apr 23 09:53:52 2002
My experience has been with CT and TRLog... I have found that TRLog, run on a dos machine (any version from 2.0 onwards to 5.0, not windoze faking it) and networked off the 232 port is absolutely bul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00301.html (9,830 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu