- 1. [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D (score: 1)
- Author: "KE5CTY Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 22:53:57 -0500
- Hi fellows: Since I am looking at selling my entire Ham Station in order to buy a FT-1000D I posted a question to the only group I knew who might know anything about the rig. I asked the FT1000MP gro
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00414.html (7,111 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D (score: 1)
- Author: "KE5CTY Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:57:35 -0500
- Well so much for selling my station for a 1000D I have it on good authority that just ain't gonna happen with what I've got. Wishful thinking I guess. At least we have a nice group now for the rig an
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00415.html (9,241 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D (score: 1)
- Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:54:28 -0500
- Is the FT-1000D the only rig that has true dual receive or does the FT-1000MP and FT-1000MPMKV also have this? Or does any other make and model have it now also. I have tried to search for "dual rece
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00121.html (6,913 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D (score: 1)
- Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:15:09 -0000
- Hi Bob, The Ten Tec Orion, Icom 7800 and Yaesu FTDX9000 series also have true dual receive. The FT1000 model did if you added the BPF-1 unit, which was standard in the FT1000D 73s John W5TD (ex NE0P)
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00122.html (8,905 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D (score: 1)
- Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:48:11 -0000
- The problem is there is no common definition of 'dual receive' the ft-1000mp/mk-v series has a second rx vfo. But it shares the antenna and front end with the main receiver so is only useful on the s
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00123.html (10,427 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:32:17 -0500
- Not sure what you mean by "true dual receive." I have three rigs that can receive on two bands at the same time: ICOM 775DSP (second VFO can be tuned to a different band) Ten-Tec Orion (two separate
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00124.html (8,865 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D (score: 1)
- Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 22:17:10 -0000
- I am sitting in front of a MKV and it does not have true dual receive. It has in-band dual receive, i.e. if I'm on 40m I can tune around 40m with the sub receiver but no other band. Also the sub rece
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00126.html (9,360 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:48:23 -0400
- Define "true dual receive". For my money, "true dual receive" means that when transmitting on one frequency, a receiver tuned to another band using another antenna still operates. So far as I have be
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00128.html (8,020 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D (score: 1)
- Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:40:00 -0400
- Bob, I am an FT-1000D owner and can report that the radio indeed has true dual receive. By this I mean it can simultaneously receive on two different bands, with two different modes if necessary. It
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00129.html (9,011 bytes)
- 10. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D (score: 1)
- Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:00:56 -0000
- The FTDX9000 does 73s John W5TD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00133.html (8,873 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu