Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FT\-9000\s+v\.\s+Icom\s+7800\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FT\-9000\s+v\.\s+Icom\s+7800\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] FT-9000 v. Icom 7800? (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:26:22 +0000; Has anyone compared these radios? If so, comments? Tnx, Barry -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Newtown, PA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00418.html (6,371 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-9000 v. Icom 7800? (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 23:30:50 -0000; Barry I have personal 'first-hand' knowledge of 4 guys, with to much time/money on their hands, who did side-by-side comparisons. Every one of them picked the 7800. Only one of them is a serious DXer; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00419.html (7,653 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]