Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FT8\s+not\s+allowed\s+in\s+Winter\s+Field\s+Day\?\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: Neil Johnson via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:03:19 -0600
Just curious as to why the sudden rules change? https://www.winterfieldday.com/rules D-Star and Fusion contacts are allowed why not FT8? -- Neil Johnson (N0SFH) ______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00080.html (7,391 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: Sterling Mann <kawfey@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:03:33 -0600
Big discussion on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/amateurradio/comments/afwgf5/ft8_is_not_an_acceptable_mode_winter_field_day/ I haven't been able to figure out the real reason, but I have a feeling
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00082.html (8,993 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:11:57 -0500
One comment that was suggested in a thread elsewhere was that Field Day is about being able to test out our ability to deploy in "emergency" situations. FT8 cannot really be used in this type of situ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00084.html (8,347 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 19:12:14 -0700
That makes good sense to me. Communications modes in an emergency situation must be able to carry a payload of information. The mode must be robust enough to carry a payload beyond R-17 and RR73. 73,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00086.html (9,282 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: Sterling Mann <kawfey@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 21:45:23 -0600
But if it can carry a payload consisting of a valid exchange, what makes it an invalid mode just for the event? Also consider JS8Call, which allows for freeform text messages. That brings to question
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00088.html (10,822 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: Gordon LaPoint <gordon.lapoint@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:18:58 -0500
JS8 would work fine, and does not appear to be on the NOT ALLOWED list.  See: <https://groups.io/g/js8call/> Gordon - N1MGO Sean WA1TE Just curious as to why the sudden rules change? https://www.wint
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00090.html (9,563 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:23:26 -0500
Why? Is telemetry not an important capability we can use? This is a very practical possible application of WSJT modes. Furthermore even by itself modes like WSPR can help us automatically measure pro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00092.html (11,884 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:34:39 -0700
I just read the rules. As far as I can see, the FT8 mode is not specifically banned. If you can send and receive the required contest exchange, go ahead and use it. DISCLAIMER: I am not a member of t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00093.html (12,745 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:56:46 -0700
Darn! I mis-spoke! FT8 is not allowed as stated at the top of the rules. K0HB -- 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his radio" _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing lis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00094.html (14,249 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:55:53 -0500
In that case I think I'll stick to summer field day, then. There is a vocal anti-FT8 contingent. I choose to boycott them if they are hostile to a mode that for some has meant the difference between
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00096.html (15,292 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Gallo" <charlie@thegallos.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:22:32 -0500
Brava 73 de KG2V _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00098.html (9,721 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: robert <wa1fcn@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:48:39 -0600
GM Ria         FT8 Has it's pluses and minuses .... This is from someone who         operates FT 8 for about 1 hour most mornings.  The minuses I         can see it's making me a lazy operator. Rathe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00099.html (15,441 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Blain" <bruce.blain@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:38:11 -0500
Do we know that the sponsors of Winter field day are part of the anti-FT8 contingent? If not, then I see no reason to boycott them. Perhaps they have a very valid reason (or reasons) for not supporti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00102.html (16,953 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: Amir Findling <sarlabs@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:26:20 -0500
Hi there, We are ham radio operators, communicators, not excommunicators! No reason to ban a mode! Changes can be made to the rules to adapt to the limitations of FT8, and while making these changes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00103.html (17,293 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:54:40 -0500
You can disable auto sequence and send the exchange as a plain text message. The future of FT8 is to support up to 100 bit messages, so built in contest exchanges are likely coming. Or you can use JS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00104.html (21,525 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: Amir Findling <sarlabs@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:57:18 -0500
Winter field day is a newcomer to the field. A bit of massaging of the rules to allow FT8, and perhaps creating multipliers that favor modes more appropriate for emergency operations, would have incl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00105.html (21,843 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Blain" <bruce.blain@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:02:03 -0500
Amir, Before I go out on a cold winter day to participate in winter field day, please share with everyone how you would make a winter field day contact using FT8. To my knowledge, the latest version
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00108.html (19,284 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Blain" <bruce.blain@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:12:27 -0500
Amir, ARRL did not alter their field day rules to support FT8. WSJT-X did. WFD might be a newcomer, but so is FT8. The sponsors of WFD asked WSJT to support WFD, and my understanding is that they wer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00109.html (21,835 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: Amir Findling <sarlabs@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:48:11 -0500
True, ARRL did not have to change the field day rules for FT8, yet they did change them for the RTTY Roundup. Exclusion is not the way. Winter Field Day organizers better learn their lesson. As for m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00112.html (25,027 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:52:34 -0600
" We are ham radio operators, communicators, not excommunicators! No reason to ban a mode!" This happens all of the time. In the ARRL 160 meter contest SSB and all digital modes are banned, as well a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00114.html (28,360 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu