- 1. [CQ-Contest] FW: Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
- Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:12:55 -0400
- A check of the RAC database shows that VE7FKM is not an issued callsign. My feeling is that whoever did this spotting did so maliciously. Someone much better equipped than me can trace the source. 73
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00306.html (9,357 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
- Author: Glenn Wyant <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:54:51 -0500
- VE7"KFM" and KF8O have had an on-going battle on 14275 for years They are both anti-contesting I would suspect that one of these folks was behind this. Glenn va3dx ___________________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00318.html (7,433 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:27:06 -0600 (CST)
- Glenn, I wouldn't be too sure of that. The amateurs (I refuse to call them "gentlemen") in question have a lot of enemies. Some of whom are also anti-contest. Just check the forums on QRZ.COM and you
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00320.html (8,825 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
- Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:41:15 -0600
- Either that, or someone else was pirating his call. That's one thing wrong with the "courtesy" feature of packet, which I think was initially set up so if you wanted to give credit for the spot to so
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00321.html (8,785 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu