Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FW\:\s+Field\s+Day\s+Comments\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] FW: Field Day Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Wayne Mills" <n7ng@bresnan.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:36:47 -0600
Same here. I have always been able to generate big pileups when providing the "WY" section during FD. It seems like there's no reason, I guess, but operators I have worked sure seem to treat it like
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00436.html (9,410 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Field Day Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:30:14 -0500
I operated Low Power 1D and grabbed a Run frequency on 10 meter SSB. I worked stations until I had to leave. I had the rate meter over 200/hr a couple of times. It didn't matter to me whether I got c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00437.html (12,330 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Field Day Comments (score: 1)
Author: "N0KK, Kirk" <n0kk@usfamily.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:58:56 -0500 (CDT)
As N7NG and N1UR have already stated...I too think it would be a great addition to FD. The idea of a bonus point category for working all of the states sounds like great fun! At our FD site, we had s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00438.html (12,050 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Field Day Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:30:24 -0500
Going back in history -- The objective of Field Day has been declared to be to promote self training by licensed amateur radio operators. The training is to cover things associated with selecting and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00000.html (8,347 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu