Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FW\:\s+Getscores\.org\s+Changes\/Improvements\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] FW: Getscores.org Changes/Improvements. (score: 1)
Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:30:07 -0500
As a multiple time winner of the USA SOAB LP categories in ARRL DX, CQWW, and WPX contests, I personally will never connect to Getscores.org. I personally believe that ONE of the factors that impacte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00225.html (7,478 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Getscores.org Changes/Improvements. (score: 1)
Author: "Felipe J Hernandez" <fhdez@vox-tel.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:19:39 -0400
I think that once you find out on get scores that your rival got an sporadic opening.. You already lost your "sporadic opportunity" on that band.. I think like others that if you are paying too much
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00226.html (8,985 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Getscores.org Changes/Improvements. (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:26:36 +0000
you would never connect to read the scores, or never send them? How about if contest sponsors required you to send scores with your claimed entry class (ala nn3w's requirement to register your inten
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00229.html (10,180 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Getscores.org Changes/Improvements. (score: 1)
Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:36:16 -0500
Its not because of fear Felipe. And not because I would be watching it. In my opinion, its not in the spirit of unassisted contesting. I am sure that the little/medium guys don't need my score to hel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00230.html (10,631 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Getscores.org Changes/Improvements. (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:46:48 +0000
So you wouldn't watch... that's ok, I'm not interested in you watching. Its not in the spirit of unassisted contesting, that is something for the contest organizers to decide. But even if they do dec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00231.html (13,529 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Getscores.org Changes/Improvements. (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:41:39 -0500
I think Randy and Ed have pretty well substantiated my point. Dave is probably right, and posting band-by-band breakdowns would not *actually* give your competitors a leg up. But if the objective is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00232.html (8,365 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Getscores.org Changes/Improvements. (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:10:37 -0800
I think it's disingenuous to suggest that if someone makes a mistake when operating a contest that they were not operating to win. The one time I've come really close to beating K5TR in a head-to-hea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00235.html (8,985 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Getscores.org Changes/Improvements. (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Frugoli" <alfred.frugoli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:02:54 -0500
Ken, I'm not quite sure what you mean by this. How exactly would it have altered your strategy? Seeing K5TR's q or mult totals vs yours? Knowing which band he was on? If you knew which band he was on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00275.html (9,891 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu