Author: "Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:48:45 -0300
Ward, Thanks for your always very well thought out, reasonable and consistently entertaining emails. It brings a smile to my face quite honestly, to see an email from you in my inbox (even if I am ha
In the most straightforward scenario, what you are proposing is a rule change to Sweepstakes and the 160 Meter Contest to change the traditional multiplier structure from "RAC Sections" to the hybrid
Author: "Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:09:08 -0300
Ward, Thanks for the insight. I have contacted Sam in the past and he said he was going to pass it along to the Advisory committee but never heard back. I have not heard from VE4BAW, RAC president, b
"The illusion of communication is that it has actually occurred." George Bernard Shaw _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
When I get puzzled or confused, which is happening more and more often, I consult the Doctor I see most often - a proctologist - for advice. He opted for Proctions Seems to me, though, that a contest
In a word, legitimacy. States, provinces, DXCC entities, sections, oblasts, shires, prefixes, CQ zones, ITU zones, etc. all offer the appearance of basic "fairness" when applied equally to everyone.
Except that to Jim's point, the sponsor and the definer of the boundaries are the same entities. SS is a section contest. Not a states and provinces contest. Want new mults, create new sections. It's