Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Field\s+Day\s+Rules\s+Change\(s\)\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 07:38:34 -0600
This one raised my eyebrow in the 2013 Field Day rules: "The use of switching systems that allow for lockout in order to use multiple transmitters (i.e., an ?octopus?) in an attempt to enter a lower-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00164.html (7,702 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: Lee Buller <k0wa@swbell.net>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 09:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
You bring up a pretty good point here. Maybe, the record should be with an asterisk and a note explaining the rule change. Like what they do in Major League Baseball....*=Steroids Lee :> K0WA In our
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00166.html (9,341 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Ritz, W7VO" <w7vo@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 17:09:02 +0000 (UTC)
What happened to "Field Day is not a contest"? ;-) 73; Mike, W7VO This one raised my eyebrow in the 2013 Field Day rules: "The use of switching systems that allow for lockout in order to use multiple
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00167.html (8,675 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 18:27:42 -0500
Can we leave our "Type A" personalities at home on field day? It should be a fun outing for clubs, and the "record" ought to be held by those who had the most fun. 73, de Hans, K0HB What happened to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00168.html (10,070 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 16:59:18 -0400
That type of operation no longer allowed partially explains the almost impossible scores in 1A, 2A, and 3A of the last several years. Bet the competitors like the 2A Buckhead Contest Group here in GA
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00169.html (8,049 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 18:56:39 -0600
Great.. there goes another fun contest. Leave it to the Type A, gotta have it their way.. win above all costs, kinds. you gotta love it... as we drive the stake deeper, and deeper... because.. we got
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00170.html (9,374 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: "K5WA" <K5WA@Comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 23:20:22 -0500
I completely agree with Steve. I also think it stifles the very creative spirit of FD itself. FD has always been a place where a small group of us gets together to try out new/different/crazy ideas t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00171.html (8,734 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 07:43:02 -0500
I didn't think FD was a contest, either. In fact, I'm not sure about now, but previous announcements for Field Day used to say you were supposed to send in "A list of stations worked." This did not r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00172.html (10,074 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 10:06:15 -0500
I guess that since I have gotten old things like this just don't bother me anymore. I operate contests (not sure if field day is even one) for fun and so do my friends. I am not likely to "compete fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00173.html (11,521 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 12:34:24 -0400
To me, part of any operating event is an opportunity to learn, to test one's skill, to figure out how to do better than the last time. I consider folks who go out for a social event in a total differ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00174.html (9,493 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 15:19:53 -0500
Hans, Type A personalities go with the territory. During my current 'adventure' it is painful for me to enter a contest knowing that I can't operate more than about 30 minutes per go and maybe a tota
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00175.html (12,237 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 15:33:21 -0500
The 'octopus' rule has a long history ? back into the early 60's. In the W0AA Field Day adventure of 1970 we had three rigs and three interlocking foot switches {think about that circuit] . Control w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00176.html (11,633 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 19:57:23 -0700
If FD hasn't become a contest, why give out so many points? Now you get points for sattelite contacts, ;points for having the newspaper and TV there, points for peddling a bicycle for power, etc, ect
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00177.html (11,342 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 21:26:36 -0700
If FD hasn't become a contest, why give out so many points? Points? We ain't got no points. We don't need no points. I DON'T HAVE TO SHOW YOU ANY STINKIN' POINTS! Sorry, it just fell into the rhythm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00180.html (9,342 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 10:31:22 -0400
As one of the operators of the W1NVT operations for 3 of the past 5 field days, all with similar scores although I did miss the 2011 record (it was not that much bigger than the 2010 number), I can a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00184.html (8,743 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 15:47:26 -0600
Okay...same band lockout wasn't used, but what about inter-band lockouts ? For example, did you have a transmitters on 15 CW and 40 CW with a lockout so that only one of those transmitters could be t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00187.html (9,610 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day Rules Change(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 03:21:36 -0400
NOPE! In fact, even worse than that, in 2008 - 2010 when I was one of the primary CW ops, I had to go outside with a flashlight to change bands with a by hand connector change. I did not hear of anyt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00189.html (9,282 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu