- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Final NS Ladder #18 (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:17:42 -0700
- Based upon the comments of others in several 3830 posts and personal discussions with some fellow NS'ers, I don't understand why the following is such a difficult concept (which if practiced, could b
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00335.html (7,031 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Final NS Ladder #18 (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:01:22 +0000
- discussions with some fellow NS'ers, I don't understand why the following is such a difficult concept (which if practiced, could bring more NS Contesting Joy to all): turning your VFO dials from x.04
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00336.html (8,472 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Final NS Ladder #18 (score: 1)
- Author: hounds1234@comcast.net (Bill Haddon - n6zfo)
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:12:58 +0000
- As in the NCJ Sprints, the NS QSY rule is a minimum of 1 KHz in all cases. (but there is no 5KHz rule in NS). Reminder of the NS (and NS LAdder) rules: "NCJ NA CW Sprint rules with the following modi
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00340.html (10,639 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu