Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Five\s+day\s+deadline\s+$was\s+new\s+scores\s+in\s+standings$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Five\s+day\s+deadline\s+$was\s+new\s+scores\s+in\s+standings$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Five day deadline (was new scores in standings) (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 14:48:48 -0400; Just my opinion: small-time stations who did not submit their score within the aggressive 5-day limit, should be allowed to see their scores listed (even in italics) along with the others. Having th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00050.html (7,602 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Five day deadline (was new scores in standings) (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 17:10:02 -0500; Tim, the organizers of the big-time contests tailor their rules to the needs of the big-time contesters. Small-time guys are only important to fill big-logs, and for a collection of money every few y; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00052.html (8,988 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]