Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Frustration\s+this\s+weekend\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Frustration\s+this\s+weekend\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend..... (score: 1): Author: VK4TI <vk4ti@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:31:21 +1000; Then there is the opposite. The true high performers like Cn2r who identify with every transmission. Listening to the mp3 files on cn2r website gives an insight into best practice pileup handling. Vk; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00009.html (10,154 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend..... (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:02:39 -0800; This is a product of the cluster/skimmer technology and it's really annoying for those of us who don't use the cluster. Being made to wait several minutes to hear the call of a station is not good ra; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00011.html (9,393 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend..... (score: 1): Author: rin JG1VGX <jg1vgx@jarl.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 12:34:32 +0900; I was also impressed by the operation by one of the ops at 5C5T last weekend. He signed every time, still rate was very high. It was something like this: his - "DL1ABC TU 5C5T" me - "JG1VGX" and bunc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00026.html (8,021 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend..... (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:33:21 -0500; I'm sure that spotting technology has encouraged the practice, but I remember, many years before the DX clusters came into being, feeling similar frustration with many of the high-rate big guns of th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00034.html (11,161 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]