Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Fw\:\s+NS3T\'s\s+wild\s+accusation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Fw\:\s+NS3T\'s\s+wild\s+accusation\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Fw: NS3T's wild accusation (score: 1): Author: ns3t@arrl.net (Jamie Dupree); Date: Fri Apr 12 18:06:52 2002; Dave - Thanks for your note. I am making no accusation of any wrongdoing by KA6BIM. I'm sorry you see it differently. I merely ran some numbers. I don't believe you did anything wrong at all. I'm jus; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00135.html (10,778 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Fw: NS3T's wild accusation (score: 1): Author: k0hb@earthlink.net (KØHB); Date: Sat Apr 13 01:50:58 2002; Un chasseur sachant chasser chasse sans son chien. (A hunter who knows how to hunt hunts without his dog); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00138.html (6,758 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Fw: NS3T's wild accusation (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Fri Apr 12 22:01:14 2002; How does one define "abuse" of the system? Who owns the rules? Who are the enlightened, privileged ones who gets to define "abuse"? Just the contest committees, who necessarily have that in their job; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00139.html (12,849 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]