Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Fw\:\s+Skimmer\s+as\s+technology\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Fw\:\s+Skimmer\s+as\s+technology\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Fw: Skimmer as technology (score: 1): Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:03:35 -0500; Hmm. Perhaps I was wrong about "RAC". K4BAI is near the top of the long list of people to whose wisdom I generally defer. 73, Art K3KU And I always thought that "RAC" meant "raw alternating current"; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00173.html (6,808 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: Skimmer as technology (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:01:09 -0600; I'm way too young to have seen it firsthand but from my reading, I always thought it meant "raw" AC. What's the point of rectifying it if you're not using a filter? Can't you just put the raw AC on t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00185.html (8,690 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]