- 1. [CQ-Contest] Game theory of spotting? (score: 1)
- Author: Dave@KA1N.CN
- Date: 23 Dec 2007 02:48:53 -0000
- As fascinating as the cheating discussion is (and it could only be better, if there were gratuitous naming of names and calls as well as legal threats), as someone with a passing interest in game the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00620.html (7,493 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Game theory of spotting? (score: 1)
- Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:10:59 +0000
- Oh yeah, lots of theory and not much analysis I think. There are many different thoughts on spotting. And its not a zero sum game in many aspects. Things to consider in the spotting game: 1. a real s
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00622.html (12,434 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Game theory of spotting? (score: 1)
- Author: "Felipe J Hernandez" <fhdez@vox-tel.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:49:48 -0400
- Dave, Im not sure If Im addressing your question, but I remember that CT1BOH posted a very interesting email in which cheerleeading was analized and its impact on scores... If I can recall, it said t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00623.html (8,603 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Game theory of spotting? (score: 1)
- Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:55:32 EST
- See Dave's # 10 below. This was the horrible problem we had at J7OJ over the past two years in ARRL DX CW. We were incorrectly spotted as J70J and even J70OJ. The net result of these prolific incorre
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00625.html (7,518 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Game theory of spotting? (score: 1)
- Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:49:49 EST
- A couple more: 1. Spotting everything has been pushed by some of the biggest multi-multis as a good thing to do. It amounts to welfare for the rich, by letting these M/M's pick off the occasional new
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00627.html (12,818 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu