Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Gap\s+Voyager\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Gap\s+Voyager\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Gap Voyager (score: 1): Author: n4bp@bc.seflin.org (Bob Patten); Date: Wed Nov 11 13:33:32 1998; Has anyone on this list used the Gap Voyager on 160 Meters? A friend is considering buying one and asked me to find out if anyone in the contest community has any experience with it on 160 Meters. 73; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00160.html (7,554 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Gap Voyager (score: 1): Author: w2xx@cloud9.net (w2xx@cloud9.net); Date: Wed Nov 11 19:54:28 1998; In a word....DUMMY LOAD! Sorry, that was two words :-) 73, J.P. W2XX -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00169.html (7,061 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Gap Voyager (score: 1): Author: dflanagan@libelle.com (Dick Flanagan); Date: Thu Nov 12 09:33:52 1998; Past reviews have the Voyager only marginally better than nothing on 160, very good on 80 and 40, and a dummy load on 20. YMMV. 73, Dick -- Dick Flanagan W6OLD CFII Minden, Nevada DM09db (South of R; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00181.html (7,489 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Gap Voyager (score: 1): Author: wd4k@bellsouth.net (Tommy Tow); Date: Thu Nov 12 13:14:56 1998; After having great performance from the GAP Challenger in a maritime environment I considered the Voyager-decided against it for the reasons previously posted. I am so impressed with the Force 12 pro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00182.html (8,422 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Gap Voyager (score: 1): Author: k0hb@juno.com (Hans Brakob); Date: Wed Nov 11 06:31:24 1998; I have had a GAP Voyager DX for several years. It's a pretty good vertical on 75/80 and 40. On 160 folks mostly CQ in your face. Never have seriously used it on 20 as I have other rotatable antennae; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00183.html (7,659 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Gap Voyager (score: 1): Author: k2uvg@gnt.net (Hank Kahrs); Date: Thu Nov 12 20:35:51 1998; Dick et al, That's a GREAT description! 73, Hank/K2UVG Voyager Owner...for 80 mtrs ONLY! -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00187.html (7,172 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Gap Voyager (score: 1): Author: david@aslin.demon.co.uk (David Aslin); Date: Fri Nov 13 06:54:24 1998; 3 seasons ago, I considered the Gap and rejected it for some of the reasons cited here already. Bought two Force 12 EF180BVs instead and built a phased 2el array. Has been a GREAT antenna for CONTEST; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00191.html (7,236 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Gap Voyager (score: 1): Author: aa9ax@iglou.com (Steve "JUNIOR" Sample); Date: Fri Nov 13 15:40:49 1998; hee hee. Well, dummy load was not by choice, but it probably works as well. My choice was (no offense to my fellow SMC-ers) the black hole in space. All the RF I ever pumped into mine was gone, but a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00198.html (8,056 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]