Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Getscores\,\s+3830\,\s+and\s+cherrypicking\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:24:57 -0500
There's been a lot of discussion recently about electronic logging, contest reporting, and live scoring, etc. Clearly amateur radio contesting has advanced to a point where it is reaching a realm of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00201.html (8,769 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:46:27 +0000
Who is going to man the phone lines so that dxpeditions without internet access can make the long distance satellite phone call to accept the declaration? What happens if you can't get through, you c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00203.html (10,274 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:51:41 -0500
I'll break your hypotheticals into questions 1) Who is going to man the phone lines so that dxpeditions without internet access can make the long distance satellite phone call to accept the declarati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00210.html (7,621 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:46:09 -0500
There is a fundamental flaw in your reasoning Rich. Where exactly do you draw the line for "major" categories and "casual" operating. For the sake of argument, let's say that I've managed to build th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00233.html (11,506 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Horn <bhorn@hornucopia.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:04:20 -0800
Since I'm in the process of revising the 3830 score posting system, NN3W's post inspires a couple of questions: 1) If you had the ability to selectively delay the posting of your claimed score until
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00246.html (8,396 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:46:36 +0000
Isn't the whole point of a 3830 that you can see how everyone did before the official results come out? It would seem contrary to that notion if you ha to wait until the log submission deadline pass
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00248.html (8,519 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:29:36 -0700
When 3830 was in it's prime before the internet it was something you looked forward to. The top players got to give their scores. You got immediate feedback on how you did. Delaying the postings for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00249.html (9,419 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:14:10 +0000
I'd leave it as is. As discussed many times, there' will always be some cheaters, and cherrypicking a category is cheating, however, getting almost instant feedback on the scores is great. Delaying i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00250.html (10,316 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: Jim George <n3bb@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:21:38 -0600
First, congratulations on your data base for the 3830 system. It is most usable and interesting. The search for a call-sign feature is excellent. I suppose I am naive but it never occurred to me that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00253.html (10,702 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:28:54 -0700
Maybe it is time that the contest sponsors shortened the log deadlines? How much log massaging needs to happen. A week or two at the max is plenty to get logs in. If you are mailing in your entry it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00260.html (9,214 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:41:04 -0700
And then, what stops me from taking the last 45 minutes of contest time to rerun the logs... and fix the errors.... maybe we need to just hook up everyone to each other... to prove no one cheats... a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00262.html (10,904 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:13:54 -0800
I have to agree with that. It is fun to read the feedback comments for the newest contest, but when postings are made that are 4 or 5 contests back, they are not as interesting. Looking at the result
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00263.html (9,330 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:39:26 +0000
If you are truly competitive, you won't win if you don't operate the last 45 minutes of the contest. The low bands are in good shape for running as well as finding new stations, and I invariably work
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00268.html (11,627 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores, 3830, and cherrypicking (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:04:18 -0600
1. No, completely defeats 3830's main purpose: immediate gratification. 2. Fewer. But while you're in update mode, how about an asterisk by the call signs of those that acknowledge they are using SO2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00287.html (8,900 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu