Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Great\s+job\s+of\s+spotting\s+network\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 17:22:13 -0400
28102 CW 2011-11-27 1408 IK2TYP 15 PZ2T 9 28102 CW 2011-11-27 1410 OH8A 15 PZ2T 9 28102 CW 2011-11-27 1410 K3IU 5 PZ2T 9 28102 CW 2011-11-27 1412 DL8CA 14 PZ2T 9 28000 CW 2011-11-27 1412 F5NSB 14 PZ2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00044.html (8,095 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 01:27:06 +0200
Maybe the same "good Samaritan" as mine? As I read on this reflector, it looks to me that there are people who forget that it is a hobby. You know, something you do for fun. 73 Steef PA3S 7064 CW 201
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00045.html (10,142 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 20:05:30 -0400
Your spots list is shorter, and spots were done during 2 days on different bands. My spots were done during only 43 minutes on the same frequency. And, lets be honest, hoe difficult is to confuse "S"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00046.html (9,085 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "Davor Kucelin" <davor.kucelin@plavalaguna.hr>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 08:48:28 +0200
Same here: 28018 CW 2011-11-27 1527 N1IBM 5 9AIP 15 28018 CW 2011-11-27 1527 W8TA 4 9AIP 15 28018 CW 2011-11-27 1527 N0UR 04 9AIP 15 28018 CW 2011-11-27 1528 WQ2N 5 9AIP 15 28018 CW 2011-11-27 1528 A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00047.html (8,431 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "Andy V. Melanyin" <ua3dpx@mail.ru>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 08:16:34 +0400
In fact working non-assisted, sometimes i hate some operators from dx lockations who give their callsign not very often, or thay think that averybody are using clusters and it's not nasesary to give
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00048.html (11,254 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 22:39:13 -0400
There you go: K9NZ-@ 28101.6 PZ2T 1408 27 Nov Suriname VE3THX 28101.6 PZ2T 1426 27 Nov Suriname _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00049.html (10,062 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 01:37:59 -0400
Hi Andy. Not sure if your are asking me, and I'm not sure that I understood your questions right, but if I did, then: 1) If you are talking about my case, that was 43 minutes of operation. And I am p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00050.html (12,367 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 12:49:30 +0200
But how can that be valid qsos without signing the call? 73 Peter, DJ7WW 3) Your "not liking" the DX station not ID-ing every QSO is nothing more than a well-known allegory of "a driver and a pedestr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00051.html (8,426 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:57:00 -0400
Peter, If you REALLY don't know and want to know how it works, you may ask members of some big DXpeditions, how they manage to make hundreds of thousands of contacts in just a few days. Regards, Yur
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00055.html (9,028 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:10:51 -0400
Thanks for mentioning this. Every contest should be a learning experience for every operator. The law in the USA is we ID at least once in every communication at the end. Legally, we are always bound
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00056.html (10,320 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:56:15 -0400
The mistakes whether done on purpose or by mistake (bust) should make you cautious on using a spot. Confirm the call. I think it was K1AR who ran the CQ WW just using spots and his comment many were
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00058.html (9,059 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:13:48 -0700
Hi Dave Also, if you start getting a whole bunch of dupes, you can pretty much figure you've been spotted wrong. 73 Tom W7WHY To the question of how could you know if you were spotted if really runni
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00059.html (9,304 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 21:07:09 -0400
That's easy, particularly toward the end of the contest. All of a sudden you get an intense pile up of dupes on your run, who seem not to be able to read your call sign, even though you send it over
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00064.html (8,959 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu