Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+HELP\-Accused\s+of\s+Cheating\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "whhendrick" <whhendrick@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:55:01 -0600
I received a note via US mail accusing me of running more power than I claimed during the 2006 CQP contest. I am asking the contesting community for some advice on this matter. I could ignore it as s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00031.html (7,311 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "Craig Cook" <craig.n7or@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:10:18 -0800
ignore. -- -- 73, Craig Cook - N7OR in Sandy, OR == "You should be ashamed of yourself" _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00033.html (8,431 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "Clint Talmadge" <unclebudd@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:31:47 -0600
The answer would depend on from whom you received the note. If it were from the accuser then I would agree with the last poster which is to ignore it. At least from a Contester's point of view. If th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00036.html (8,821 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:46:17 -0700
Who was the complaint from and how could they prove such an accusation? If the letter was not signed toss it in the trash and get on with the contest season. If you did nothing wrong then do nothing.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00037.html (9,273 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:00:36 -0600 (CST)
Was it an "official" note or was it just from another contester or fellow amateur? If it was from the FCC, you'd need to reply to it. If it was an OO card, it's maybe something to respond to. Otherwi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00039.html (8,858 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:03:18 -0000
FILE IT or take it to the Throne aka: Library and hopefully you can soften it enuff for some serious work. Quack _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00040.html (9,416 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:21:04 EST
Wow Bill, If you were at N0NI, I'm sure a low power signal from there, would seem like a 1kw signal to a dipole anywhere else! Who was it from? What did it say? When you sign your name that you opera
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00041.html (7,803 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: g.m.mcadams@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 01:04:06 +0000
Bill, You bet! Ignore it. This is nothing more than an extreme case of sour grapes. Although the accuser shows a little more courage than most of the snipers. You know how you competed; the other sta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00043.html (8,975 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 22:37:29 -0600 (CST)
I remember one year in ARRL DX CW I worked V73C on 40. He sent me "005" as his power. He was REALLY REALLY loud. I almost fell out of my chair. He told me a few years later that he was indeed running
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00051.html (9,752 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: 4X4KF <4x4kf@iarc.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:34:34 +0200
Or like the Columbus egg. "Dear accuser, use also 15 KW" Michael 4x4kf -- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00056.html (10,587 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:56:08 -0600
I once tuned across a western Pacific DX-pedition just as he said -- now listening for QRP. QRP only! So I turned down the rig to 5 watts and gave him a call. He was very upset because I was obviousl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00062.html (9,677 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "w4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 15:01:54 -0500
The ocean does marvelous things for signals. I'm oceanfront here on the southern tip of my island and have ocean and bay takeoffs in all directions except NNW. I can run LP or QRP on 40M with the bea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00068.html (10,027 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:44:59 -0500
I think it was N6NB who had an article in a magazine who found that using a big antenna with 100 watts beat or equalled a lower antenna and a KW. I recall N6TR visiting Pat, W5WMU's super station and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00072.html (8,745 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:51:50 -0000
Amen to the QRP on 160. I have done it twice, once from Calif and once from here. I never had a run either place. It was S&P all the time. It took 4 hrs on/off to snag ZF1A and 1 1/2 to snag JT1CO. B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00073.html (10,164 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu