Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Headphones\s+for\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Headphones\s+for\s+CW\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: "Collins, Graham" <CollinG@navcanada.ca>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:07:40 -0500; I have tried all sorts of different headphones for CW work, some good, some not so good. Lately I have tried a good pair of Sennheiser "earbud" type. Good sound, worked very well but I found them unc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00548.html (8,774 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: Michael Dinkelman <mwdink@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:33:45 -0800 (PST); I've had Sennheiser HD280's for 2-3 years. Ever since I tired of DSP noise cancelling types. I wanted comfort and significant passive noise reduction. The Sennheiser has been great and I even adapted; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00552.html (10,323 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:56:44 -0400; I picked up the Yamaha CM500 headset and found it very comfortable over very long stretches of time and it is light and the mic is ok if you can equalize it. They can be bought for around $50 bucks.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00554.html (9,691 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:47:21 -0700; I brought several headsets with me to K0RF, including these: Able Planet NC180B Foldable Noise Canceling Headphones http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?Prodid=11644899 They were comfortable, so; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00561.html (9,045 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:30:39 +0200; Wow ! Looks good on paper. I have now some years old Bose QC2 that I like. Time has passed, maybe there really is something as good in lower price range. Looking for newer noise cancelling earphones,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00563.html (10,245 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: Lew Paceley <lew@paceley.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:55:01 -0700; Hi Graham, I use the Sony V6 headphones (predecessor to the 7506?) with all my radios. They have very low distortion and are quite comfortable on my head. They are not the "soundproof" fitting of PRO; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00565.html (10,562 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:29:34 -0700; My favorite headphones are Sony in-the-ear MDR-W08. They were about $10 at Wal-Mart or Target. The model number may be different now as these are about 10 years old. I've used them for 48h contests w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00571.html (9,781 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: rin JG1VGX <jg1vgx@jarl.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:17:08 +0900; Hi, I own MDR-7506 and love it. I bought that for listening to music, not for radio, but it works for both. As a music listening headphone, it is splendid. I enjoy acoustic music, jazz, classical etc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00579.html (10,125 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 07:23:56 -0500; Looking at the pix, I think these may have the same problem as the Logitech sound canceling headphones that were briefly the rage a couple of years back. They are built to fold into a relatively smal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00010.html (10,512 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: "Collins, Graham" <CollinG@navcanada.ca>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 08:25:48 -0500; Good evening Rin, Thank you for your comments. Comments so far have been split equally between the HD280 and the MDR7506. It would seem that they are equally like by those who use them. I considered; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00016.html (10,039 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:05:47 -0800; I have had excellent luck with these: http://www.amazon.com/JBuds-Premium-Hi-Fi-Noise-Isolating-Earbuds/dp/B001GS8FZ2/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1322787658&sr=8-4 They are extremely comfortable, and they; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00035.html (11,674 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: "Collins, Graham" <CollinG@navcanada.ca>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:25:05 -0500; Good morning Matt (and all), Thank you all for your input on my question. I was out Christmas shopping yesterday evening and took some time to have a "look - touch - listen - try" of many of the curr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00042.html (9,127 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 14:30:51 -0500 (EST); Hi, I go out and buy the cheapest on-the-ear headphones I can find, usually for about $10, and use them until they fall apart. Currently I have an old pair of Sony (MDR-026) headphones. The foam pads; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00051.html (9,084 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headphones for CW (score: 1): Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:50:03 -0800; Graham -- I have a pair of the 280s also (or a very similar model) and the audio quality is superb, though my pair fits a bit tight on my rather large noggin. Congrats on the decision. 73, Matt, NQ6N; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00055.html (10,816 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]