Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+High\s+power\s+reclassification\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+High\s+power\s+reclassification\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] High power reclassification (score: 1): Author: Drew Vonada-Smith <drew@whisperingwoods.org>; Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 11:41:26 -0500; Igor, If I can rephrase your argument, you are saying: 1) Congrats to RDXC that they want to catch cheaters. I agree. 2) That since no good method exists to do so, then an invalid method is O; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00083.html (10,766 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] High power reclassification (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 00:12:14 +0500; Drew, 1)Yes it is my argument 2)No it is not my argument. Invalid method is not OK if it is invalid. Since I do not know the details of the method I am not in a position to make a judgment. 3) I do n; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00093.html (12,986 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] High power reclassification (score: 1): Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:36:43 -0500; Hi Igor, Comments below. Good. Also good. Yes, but once a system has been devised that works, not by throwing people under buses without allowing them to defend themselves. 73, kelly, ve4xt _________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00109.html (14,610 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]