Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+How\s+low\s+will\s+they\s+go\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+How\s+low\s+will\s+they\s+go\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] How low will they go? (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:11:43 -0400; I was amazed just now to hear VY2** CQing on 7017.3. Surely this is too low for SSB, even by recent standards. I know it's a voluntary bandplan, but sheesh. 73, Pete N4ZR The World HF Contest Station; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00627.html (6,980 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] How low will they go? (score: 1): Author: "yo3ctk" <yo3ctk@alltrom.ro>; Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:37:37 +0200; A few hours ago the band was full of SSB signals up to 7001. The 40m band is simply too narrow in Region 1 to accommodate the huge attendance of major SSB contests. That's the naked truth and until t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00636.html (8,056 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] How low will they go? (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 08:00:03 -0500; Surely this is too low for SSB, even by recent standards. I know it's a voluntary bandplan, but sheesh. Just a taste of things to come if the ARRL and FCC get their way. They like the way the rest of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00638.html (7,322 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] How low will they go? (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:42:09 +0000; W4ZV added: Potential change to USA bandplan is serious concern to rest of the world. With R1, the bandplan is such a big deal that I have even had R1 stations operating in R3 run around & jam me bec; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00648.html (7,559 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] How low will they go? (score: 1): Author: "Mario" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:09:02 +0100; I even heard one station below (and since he was fairly rare other EU stations were answering). My small country runs "made in USA" 300 kW at 918 kHz providing free EU beacon on 1836 kHz while prote; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00659.html (7,404 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] How low will they go? (score: 1): Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:39:43 +0200; I was glad to be able to hear so many stations on 40. Kind-of allocation is 60kHz but there are non-hams stopping us from using the whole band. If the 40 kHz that we are allowed, would have been used; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00697.html (7,717 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] How low will they go? (score: 1): Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:19:58 -0800 (PST); I heard many stations CQing far below 7010. The absolute winner was P40W - I heard him within a good hour on 7003.0. Wonder if Aruba's bandplan allows to operate SSB from CW DX edge? Also, many US st; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00045.html (7,955 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]