Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+How\s+many\s+more\s+creative\s+subjects\s+using\s+\"skimmer\"\s+are\s+there\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:30:42 -0700
Lots of interesting reading on cq-contest about the skimmer concept. I think it is fair to say "one size does not fit all". What is one person's idea of a natural extension of technology will be anot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00555.html (10,033 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
Tree, Somehow I can just picture your eyes alight in ecstasy over the possibilities of skimmer log checking... It will solve some problems and maybe create new ones. What would prevent someone from g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00564.html (8,230 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:00:12 EDT
I am starting to agree with those who think the time has come to send in an audio file (or CD) along with your log. == I disagree that an audio file should be required. I do believe that an audio fil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00569.html (7,853 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:26:14 -0400
Simple solution, which I've advocated before. Logs (at least "competitive" logs) should be sent in by 0100Z, one hour after the end of the contest. Exceptions for DXpeditions and others on an individ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00573.html (10,183 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:34:52 -0400
OK, as long as you promise not to laugh at how bad my CW is when I send with the paddle at 3:00 AM local... 73, Dick WC1M _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00575.html (8,465 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Sounds good, but... There will be endless fights over "exceptions" and "competitive"... And, where's the incentive for a casual operator who just might win, place or show? This might solve one proble
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00576.html (11,422 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 18:04:48 -0400
Oh sure. 1 hour. One lousy hour. I pity the poor multi-multi station owner/operators who didn't invest in a network configuration, who kept separate computers for each band/station, who have one hour
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00026.html (11,817 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 20:48:48 -0600
For a competitive multi-multi, planning for this is just another task to be worked, just like many other tasks that need to be worked for a successful multi-multi. I'm sure that K3LR would approach t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00033.html (8,728 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 14:20:29 -0400
You're missing my point. I'm sorry, I guess I should have gone on boring everyone with paragraph upon paragraph of excruciating detail. One hour is an exceedingly short and unreasonable time for the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00046.html (10,279 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 19:41:44 -0500
Ron, I'm sorry, but I do not agree. I don't think this is too much to ask for any entrant - never mind the multi-multis. As Steve rightly points out, they would just do what the rules require and not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00053.html (11,989 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 21:19:42 -0500
I don't necessarily think that an hour is too restrictive for the serious players, but I do wonder what evidence we have that cheating is so rampant, so widespread that draconian guilty-until-proven-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00070.html (14,579 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu