Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+How\s+unethical\s+is\s+this\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+How\s+unethical\s+is\s+this\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] How unethical is this? (score: 1): Author: Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:28:59 -0500; It's against the rules to telephone somebody during the Contest to get them on the air to work you. Some people think that making skeds even BEFORE the 'Test is unethical. (I wonder if they also thin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00305.html (9,641 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] How unethical is this? (score: 1): Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:39:01 -0700; What you suggest might be unethical in some situations, but I think getting new or otherwise inactive hams on the air balances out the equation. If you are angling for a top spot, you could bring you; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00309.html (12,210 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] How unethical is this? (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:13:56 -0800; Encouraging activity is a good thing. Encouraging them to work people is a great thing. I think that is the key. If these people all ended up working the same six club members, then it would start lo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00311.html (8,157 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] How unethical is this? (score: 1): Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:28:07 -0800; Art, if we get to the point where showing off your operation to neighbor hams is "unethical", then we probably should send Kilocycle Kops around to inspect your station during the contest to make sur; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00312.html (8,870 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] How unethical is this? (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:44:50 -0500; Hi Art Great idea to get everyone fired up for the contest! Why not just enter as a multi-op, and let each of them make as many QSO's as they wish? That way, even if their station are not in 100% ope; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00315.html (8,078 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] How unethical is this? (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:12:17 -0500; First, it's a good thing to see that we're actually having discussions about contest ethics - that's a Good Thing. I don't see any problem with encouraging them to get on and give you a call - along; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00317.html (8,273 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] How unethical is this? (score: 1): Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:36:40 -0800; Actually it sounds dangerous. The amount of local QRM here in silicon valley is pretty bad, but I just cannot imagine having four or five others on the same block all doing the same contest at once.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00318.html (9,141 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] How unethical is this? (score: 1): Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:56:27 -0600; Tom beat me to it. Back in the mid '90s a friend and I gathered a lot of interest in the club and local ham community by doing multi-op efforts in SS, CQ WW, and IARU HF Championship. We never tackle; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00319.html (8,882 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]