Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+I\s+don\'t\s+QSL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+I\s+don\'t\s+QSL\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] I don't QSL (score: 1): Author: radio@UDel.Edu (ROBERT PENNEYS); Date: Mon Feb 16 20:26:16 1998; I didn't see the beginning of this thread. It is quoted that the final courtesy of any QSO is a QSL. I happen to hate to write by hand and do not log. Used to have to log every CQ, much less QSO, way; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00149.html (8,250 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] I don't QSL (score: 1): Author: n4bp@bc.seflin.org (Bob Patten); Date: Tue Feb 17 01:41:29 1998; You are not alone! It was interesting to read your post since we seem to have the exact same experience and attitude about QSLing. I threw away a collection that filled a bedroom chest of drawers man; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00164.html (7,792 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]