Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+I\s+loved\s+the\s+WPX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+I\s+loved\s+the\s+WPX\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] I loved the WPX (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:46:55 +0700; This is long, sorry. At 69 with beginning shakey fingers and less stanima, I nevertheless entered the WPX ssb with determination. I came out breaking 2 million points and with a very satisfying exper; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00009.html (8,793 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] I loved the WPX (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 07:10:46 -0500; I really enjoyed WPX SSB this year as well. Just seemed more fun than usual. Conditions were good, although not great. But, good enough that stations were able to spread out across all bands. Activit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00032.html (10,814 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] I loved the WPX (score: 1): Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:19:32 -0400; Great commentary! Nice to hear someone who is NOT CARPING about their pet peeve, or complaining just because conditions were marginal for a part or all of the period, or that some (most?) people didn; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00047.html (9,581 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]