Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IARU\s+HQ\s+Callsigns\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IARU\s+HQ\s+Callsigns\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 19:20:55 -0700; Saw this recently posted: ... This appears to conflict with the following rule for the IARU contest: "4.3.3. Only one HQ station callsign per member society per frequency band is permitted." The rule; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00081.html (7,813 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Jesus EC1KR" <jesus.ec1kr@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:19:14 +0200; you are right dear Tree. Is being breached a basic rule of the contest, other HQs in EU are failing this rule. You must use the same call in a band and TWO MODES (SSB/CW). Greetings. 73 de Jesus EC1K; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00083.html (8,967 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: rin JG1VGX <jg1vgx@jarl.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 20:59:12 +0900; If the interpretation by Tree is true, Japan is also violating the rule for a number of years, this year inclusive, and have never been notified. Here is this year's list of 8NxHQ (mult=JARL) 160 CW; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00084.html (9,397 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Bob I.2.WIJ" <i2wij@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:49:02 +0100 (BST); Hi Tree and all, since dear friend Jesus has difficult to type the name of Italy and ARI, I do for him. ARI like our Japanese friends of JARL is "violating" the 4.3.3. rule since many years and we a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00085.html (10,600 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: Ricardo Navarrete <ricardoea4zk@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 16:33:27 +0200; Hi all, The rules are clear , same call in the same band So 160 Ssb xx0hq 160 cw xx0hq 80 ssb xx1hq 80 cw xx1hq And so on....... if you don't follow this rule, you can be disqualified. Good luck ! __; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00086.html (11,038 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Jesus EC1KR" <jesus.ec1kr@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:41:36 +0200; Dear Bob. As Manager of the ARI you should know well the rules of international Contests, but as we can see you not know. In Italy, Japan, Argentina, Spain, etc... all have restrictions to use the sa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00087.html (11,824 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:32:10 -0500; In my not so humble opinion, rules should not be created in a vacuum with disregard to the reality of staffing HQ stations within different countries. As can be seen, a radio/telecommunication author; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00088.html (16,574 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:46:33 -0500 (CDT); A simple solution might be to modify the rules so that in those cases where for whatever reason there are multiple HQ station calls, only one HQ multiplier counts. For example, if, say, W1AW, W1AW/4; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00089.html (17,350 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:14:04 -0600; Is this a big enough deal to ask the ARRL CAC to review the IARU rules? 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN The ARRL CAC has no say in the IARU HF contest rules. This is an IARU contest, not an ARRL contest. Of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00093.html (9,171 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 16:56:35 -0400; As stated, the question seems to besimilar to "how many pins can dance on the head of an Angel." That's why I rarely contribute to this forum. Perhaps thequestion should be: Ifthere 24 stations IDing; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00094.html (10,338 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:21:11 -0400; OIC. The rules are specific. It doesn't mean that there cannot be two stations on the two modes on simultaneously from ID'ing themselves as W1AW, for example, but they should have the same call on th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00096.html (10,483 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 01:49:59 -0300; Hi Tree. Well...That is your interpretation of the rule. LU4AA has been entering the contest using the same callsign scheme since 2007 upon agreement with the organizers. To me: 10 M CW is one freque; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00097.html (11,842 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: John Dorr <k1ar@aol.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:35:42 -0400; Good morning all, I'd like to shed some light on the IARU HF Championship callsign debate, put forth the final action plan and have us move on. Several years ago, the World Wide Radio Operators Found; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00100.html (11,967 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: John Dorr <k1ar@aol.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:44:44 -0400; Good morning all, I'd like to shed some light on the IARU HF Championship callsign debate, put forth the final action plan and have us move on. Several years ago, the World Wide Radio Operators Found; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00104.html (17,150 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: John Dorr <cqk1ar@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:48:51 -0400; Good morning all, I'd like to shed some light on the IARU HF Championship callsign debate, put forth the final action plan and have us move on. Several years ago, the World Wide Radio Operators Found; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00106.html (11,703 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:48:34 -0300; Thank you so much John for your note. We'll find a way out here in LU-land for next year's IARU HF Championship. Vy 73. Martin, LU5DX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00107.html (18,814 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns (score: 1): Author: Luc Moreira <py8azt@dxbrasil.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:06:08 -0300; OMs, Thanks for clarify this issue. I was curious about LRxF first place in SA. I didn't know what that means. In Brazil, the issue is many ITU Zones (12, 13 and 15), and rules disallow same HQ on di; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00110.html (20,558 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]