Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IARU\s+R1\s+proposals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IARU\s+R1\s+proposals\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 proposals (score: 1): Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:30:08 -0800; An interesting set of proposals. As a radiosport enthusiast, I'd be concerned about this one: ==Contest-free sections in all HF contests== The Emcomm folks are being quite vocal about this issue, and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00023.html (9,573 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 proposals (score: 1): Author: "Shore Marine" <shore1@xplornet.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:31:50 -0800; I suggest if they cannot share a shared resource, then they should all go take their shovels and pails, go back to their own sandboxes and find another HOBBY. They cannot seem to understand that this; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00027.html (12,025 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 proposals (score: 1): Author: Mike/Shelley Ritz <micritz@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:24:57 +0000 (UTC); The one BIG problem I see in limiting contesting to a specific set of frequencies are how they will affect the big gun stations that sit on run frequencies for hours on end. There is not enough bandw; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00028.html (11,398 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 proposals (score: 1): Author: Guy Molinari <guy_molinari@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 05:19:12 +0000; I read the petition and I agree with it 100%. We need contest free zones. Maybe there is an elmer out there that can show them the button that says 18 mHz. 73, Guy N7ZG ______________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00038.html (14,178 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 proposals (score: 1): Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>; Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:47:53 -0800; I have been sworn by these lids for operating on 14302 KHz. They deserve nothing but contempt. -- From: "Shore Marine" <shore1@xplornet.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 4:31 PM To: "Richard Di; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00040.html (13,603 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 proposals (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:14:50 -0500; Since the most popular Ham Radio Activity around the world is contesting, I would like to propose that we EXPAND the contest activity to all of the HF Bands. Why should 30,000 hams be constrained wit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00058.html (8,398 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 proposals (score: 1): Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:06:23 -0600; I've been an Amateur since 1975, And an on and off again contester all this time also. I have gone through several sunspot minimums so I know what the bands are like during the low times like we are; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00061.html (17,896 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 proposals (score: 1): Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>; Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:54:06 -0600; Just now I took a look at 3580 kHz with Fldigi in PSK31 mode and counted 8 to 10 streams plus W1AW in a 2 kHz slice of spectrum. I have found that a lot of the casual QSO ragchews that used to happen; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00071.html (8,572 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]