Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IARU\s+band\s+plans\s+\-\s+just\s+what\s+are\s+they\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they? (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:04:38 +0000
A while back there was some discussion here about the IARU R1 band plan, as a result of DARC adopting the R1 band plan in the WAE rules. Here is a post to that thread by DL6KVA: http://search.contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00025.html (9,182 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they? (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 05:39:32 -0800 (PST)
Has WAE or any contest organization penalized folks for not following the IARU band plans? Has there ever been any penalties levied against a contester by any official IARU organization? Julius Fazek
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00053.html (11,519 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they? (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:14:45 +0000
N2WN asked: I believe only this year's WAE contests that the new rule adding the IARU R1 band plan has applied, so we have yet to see what is done about violations of the rule. The second question I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00073.html (10,829 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they? (score: 1)
Author: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 04:01:01 -0600
I have to admit, with my absense from Amateur radio for many years, I didn't know much about the IARU. Someone mentioned that many radio amateurs believed they are a governing authority, and I must a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00079.html (13,632 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they? (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:37:51 +0100
I visited last IARU R1 conference in Cavtat mainly to say hallo to my old friends KA1ZD/K1ZZ. I was amazed by the amount of "work" done there. Lot of meetings on obscure admin subjects. However, I la
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00082.html (8,679 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they? (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:47:07 +0000
The IOTA Contest has a rule requiring adherence. It is difficult to "prove" non-adherence but there is often strong evidence (especially when there is full-frequency logging by one or both stations).
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00177.html (14,657 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they? (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:52:51 +0000
Much discussion about the R2 yachtie net laying claim to 14300, but not about how IARU band plans getting incorporated into contest rules & the inevitable consequences of this. Contests are turning o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00214.html (8,688 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 22:22:16 -0500
I think the problem boils down to this: Bandplans assume "normal" loading, and try to concentrate certain types of activity together. Most of the time, this is fine. However, this idea falls apart wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00217.html (11,324 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they? (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 04:24:25 -0800 (PST)
Thanks for the response Don. Some contests are certainly easier to contain within the recommended frequencies. This is one of those things where size definitely matters. This is an ancient battle in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00218.html (18,068 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 23:25:41 -0500
I'd say you have 6 contests where conflict is likely... ARRL DX WPX RDXC WAE CQWW Sweeps 73 Rich NN3W -- Original Message -- From: "Tom Haavisto" <kamham69@gmail.com> To: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00223.html (13,053 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they? (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:43:22 -0600
While not technically billed as a contest, ARRL Field Day brings out its share of anti-contest rhetoric. I find it interesting that in the wake of the recent CQWW CW 'test we have heard a lot of, not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00234.html (9,782 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu