Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IARU\s+test\s+newbie\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IARU\s+test\s+newbie\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] IARU test newbie question (score: 1): Author: Timothy.Urban@wc.ey.com (Timothy.Urban@wc.ey.com); Date: Mon Jul 15 18:05:03 2002; LIsters, etiquette question follows: I worked another station on SSB during the IARU contest, the other op got my callsign correct, but apparently mis-heard my ITU zone. I said "five nine - zero eigh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00144.html (8,111 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] IARU test newbie question (score: 1): Author: N5RP@pdq.net (Bob, N5RP); Date: Mon Jul 15 18:09:12 2002; ==> If you can work him again without too much effort, and without costing yourself whatever contest asset(s) you consider important, do so. I would scrub the busted 1st QSO from my log. No matter wh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00145.html (7,543 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] IARU test newbie question (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Mon Jul 15 19:35:10 2002; More than likely, you'll get "QSO B4 QRZ" and be SOL for a second QSO (which again, is a reason to work dupes ... just in case one of the two made an error). On the other hand, if you count the QSO .; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00147.html (7,389 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] IARU test newbie question (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net (Mark Bailey); Date: Mon Jul 15 21:47:13 2002; Hello, all: "QSO B4 QRZ" mystifies me. Or, maybe, "B4 PJ2M" or "DUPE PJ2M" or whatever, which seems more efficient. Why would the run station EVER send this? Is the run station going to send QSO B4 a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00151.html (10,411 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]